Public Evidence Packet
Amazon - AWS Service Terms
AWS Service Terms
ffa8f31e-15ff-4c58-b19c-4b29c2e41c6b- Screening date
- 28 Oct 2026, 13:38 UTC
- Jurisdiction
- Global
- Risk screening
- High · 7/10
- Score trace
- +1 points from previous public change
This packet records PolicyWatcher evidence and AI-assisted screening for one public change. It is not legal advice, a compliance verdict, a certification, or proof that the external source remains unchanged.
- 01Source evidence
- 02Explainability
- 03Governance Relevance
- 04Report Output
Dataset QA · sanitized public view
Source evidence
- Publication gate
- Published
- Retrieval state
- Recorded retrieval available
- Latest retrieval
- 28 Oct 2026, 13:38 UTC
- Sanitized channel
direct- Data status
- Available
- Public snapshot evidence
- Available
Public snapshot fingerprints
38493fdad1820615c99e5074f1342147fcbfad5543b5a61c07ed8ac8d3d1ff45Captured 15 Oct 2026, 04:41 UTCa33b28182df8ac8cf2e427695834578ab693eb63e489be9daa69dac202a2fd8cCaptured 28 Oct 2026, 13:38 UTCSource confidence describes recorded retrieval and publication state. It does not rate the provider policy or certify source authenticity.
Source-anchored screening trace
Explainability
AWS now uses content from its new Continuum service for AI training by default, with an opt-out, and details abuse detection for AI services.
- Reason 1+1 score contribution
New AI service content used for model training by default.
- Related KPI
- AI training opt-out
- Source side
- new snapshot
Verified exact source passage
“You agree and instruct that for Amazon CodeGuru Profiler, Amazon Comprehend, AWS Continuum (except AWS Continuum for penetration testing, previously named AWS Security Agent), Amazon Lex, Amazon Polly, Amazon Rekognition, Amazon Textract, A”
- Reason 2+0.5 score contribution
Explicit mention of human review for abuse detection in AI services.
- Related KPI
- Content moderation
- Source side
- Not recorded
Source passage not recordedThis historical reason has no recorded source passage.
- Reason 3+0.5 score contribution
Information about suspected misuse of AWS Continuum may be shared with third parties.
- Related KPI
- Third-party sharing
- Source side
- new snapshot
Verified exact source passage
“We may share information, that does not include Your Content, about suspected misuse of AWS Continuum for code vulnerabilities involving a third-party model with the provider of that third-party model.”
Score reasons and deltaScore values are stored AI-assisted screening outputs. Verified anchors confirm only that the quoted passage occurs in the named snapshot; they do not prove the interpretation.
Advisory review map
Governance Relevance
EU AI Act
Official Journal text, 2024
Which recorded policy statements may be relevant to transparency, automated decisions, data use and human oversight review?
- AI training opt-out
- Opt-Out
- Algorithmic transparency
- Opaque
- Automated decisions
- Opaque
- AI bias and fairness
- Mentioned
ISO/IEC 42001
ISO/IEC 42001:2023 overview
Which recorded policy statements may inform an AI management-system review of transparency, risk oversight and independent assurance?
- Algorithmic transparency
- Opaque
- AI bias and fairness
- Mentioned
- Independent audit
- Absent
- Regulatory compliance
- Comprehensive
NIST AI RMF
AI RMF 1.0; NIST revision in progress, checked 2026-07-29
Which recorded policy statements may support Govern, Map, Measure or Manage review questions?
- Algorithmic transparency
- Opaque
- Automated decisions
- Opaque
- AI bias and fairness
- Mentioned
- Content moderation
- Partial
OECD AI Principles
OECD AI Principles, updated 2024
Which recorded policy statements may be relevant to transparency, fairness, accountability and user agency review?
- Consent mechanism
- Opt-Out
- Algorithmic transparency
- Opaque
- AI bias and fairness
- Mentioned
- Independent audit
- Absent
Mappings identify review relevance between recorded PolicyWatcher KPI fields and framework topics. They are not legal interpretations, conformity assessments, certifications or compliance verdicts.
Exact change-bound files
Report Output
Both files are generated from this exact change ID.
Download exact-change PDF Download exact-change JSONe4943dd6e99732bcf7b8458fb23201262d224ce9403bea1a6216852391f11a69Questions before reuse
- Does the original AWS Service Terms source still match the recorded public snapshot version 3?
- Do the cited source passages support each displayed reason, KPI value and regional note?
- Which advisory framework topics require specialist legal, risk or governance review for this use case?
- Has a later public change superseded this packet before it is reused in a decision or publication?