Public Evidence Packet
Anthropic - Terms of Service
Terms of Service
cc94dcd8-eca9-46b1-8e0a-1c6a249606f4- Screening date
- 07 Nov 2026, 19:38 UTC
- Jurisdiction
- Global
- Risk screening
- Medium · 6/10
- Score trace
- Baseline; no earlier public change
This packet records PolicyWatcher evidence and AI-assisted screening for one public change. It is not legal advice, a compliance verdict, a certification, or proof that the external source remains unchanged.
- 01Source evidence
- 02Explainability
- 03Governance Relevance
- 04Report Output
Dataset QA · sanitized public view
Source evidence
- Publication gate
- Published
- Retrieval state
- Recorded retrieval available
- Latest retrieval
- 07 Nov 2026, 19:38 UTC
- Sanitized channel
direct- Data status
- Available
- Public snapshot evidence
- Available
Public snapshot fingerprints
958baaf2cf3723f1349e6ad26caffea37a824d4b3ab3acd8a040977a4dd0b8c6Captured 06 Jul 2026, 07:20 UTC081f4338213068b24ad33688e86e918b58b1babd45b0fac8d6e12b99ee285d43Captured 07 Nov 2026, 19:38 UTCSource confidence describes recorded retrieval and publication state. It does not rate the provider policy or certify source authenticity.
Source-anchored screening trace
Explainability
Anthropic's updated Terms of Service contain no material changes, maintaining existing policies on data use, AI training opt-out, and user rights.
- Reason 10 score contribution
AI training opt-out has exceptions for feedback and safety reviews.
- Related KPI
- AI training opt-out
- Source side
- new snapshot
Verified exact source passage
“Even if you opt out, we will use Materials for model training when: (1) you provide Feedback to us regarding any Materials, or (2) your Materials are flagged for safety review to improve our ability to detect harmful content, enforce our po”
- Reason 20 score contribution
Anthropic can report user data to law enforcement at its sole discretion.
- Related KPI
- Regulatory compliance
- Source side
- new snapshot
Verified exact source passage
“We reserve the right, at our sole discretion, to report information from or about you, including but not limited to Inputs or Outputs, to law enforcement.”
- Reason 30 score contribution
No clear data retention periods are specified for general user data.
- Related KPI
- Data retention
- Source side
- Not recorded
Source passage not recordedThis historical reason has no recorded source passage.
Score reasons and deltaScore values are stored AI-assisted screening outputs. Verified anchors confirm only that the quoted passage occurs in the named snapshot; they do not prove the interpretation.
Advisory review map
Governance Relevance
EU AI Act
Official Journal text, 2024
Which recorded policy statements may be relevant to transparency, automated decisions, data use and human oversight review?
- AI training opt-out
- Opt-Out
- Algorithmic transparency
- Opaque
- Automated decisions
- Opaque
- AI bias and fairness
- Absent
ISO/IEC 42001
ISO/IEC 42001:2023 overview
Which recorded policy statements may inform an AI management-system review of transparency, risk oversight and independent assurance?
- Algorithmic transparency
- Opaque
- AI bias and fairness
- Absent
- Independent audit
- Absent
- Regulatory compliance
- Partial
NIST AI RMF
AI RMF 1.0; NIST revision in progress, checked 2026-07-29
Which recorded policy statements may support Govern, Map, Measure or Manage review questions?
- Algorithmic transparency
- Opaque
- Automated decisions
- Opaque
- AI bias and fairness
- Absent
- Content moderation
- Partial
OECD AI Principles
OECD AI Principles, updated 2024
Which recorded policy statements may be relevant to transparency, fairness, accountability and user agency review?
- Consent mechanism
- Implicit
- Algorithmic transparency
- Opaque
- AI bias and fairness
- Absent
- Independent audit
- Absent
Mappings identify review relevance between recorded PolicyWatcher KPI fields and framework topics. They are not legal interpretations, conformity assessments, certifications or compliance verdicts.
Exact change-bound files
Report Output
Both files are generated from this exact change ID.
Download exact-change PDF Download exact-change JSON3fae1d6f8240e4a810f047cc4b33a247c8393a8769c4348632c216c4115bfe54Questions before reuse
- Does the original Terms of Service source still match the recorded public snapshot version 2?
- Do the cited source passages support each displayed reason, KPI value and regional note?
- Which advisory framework topics require specialist legal, risk or governance review for this use case?
- Has a later public change superseded this packet before it is reused in a decision or publication?