Public Evidence Packet
OpenAI - Usage Policies
Usage Policies
b2d5abd7-975d-4f45-8c59-14592b7007cb- Screening date
- 23 Oct 2026, 11:40 UTC
- Jurisdiction
- Global
- Risk screening
- High · 7/10
- Score trace
- Baseline; no earlier public change
This packet records PolicyWatcher evidence and AI-assisted screening for one public change. It is not legal advice, a compliance verdict, a certification, or proof that the external source remains unchanged.
- 01Source evidence
- 02Explainability
- 03Governance Relevance
- 04Report Output
Dataset QA · sanitized public view
Source evidence
- Publication gate
- Published
- Retrieval state
- Recorded retrieval available
- Latest retrieval
- 23 Oct 2026, 11:40 UTC
- Sanitized channel
direct- Data status
- Available
- Public snapshot evidence
- Available
Public snapshot fingerprints
6ecf204b1e014f2db25b3fbeffcf3c4c2582bffdf094ac4400dc09929ae5e475Captured 02 Oct 2026, 04:56 UTC7d3127522218e9c7976f0af531dd23c0b7e240cf7f6c34ea1f3675d0533a0debCaptured 23 Oct 2026, 11:40 UTCSource confidence describes recorded retrieval and publication state. It does not rate the provider policy or certify source authenticity.
Source-anchored screening trace
Explainability
New OpenAI policies restrict using outputs to train competing AI models, tighten rules on professional advice, and enhance minor protection.
- Reason 1+3 score contribution
New restriction on using OpenAI outputs to train competing AI models.
- Related KPI
- AI training opt-out
- Source side
- new snapshot
Verified exact source passage
“You must not use OpenAI models or their outputs to generate, prepare, select, or supply training material or signals for models that are intended as alternatives to or substitutes for OpenAI models or services.”
- Reason 2+2 score contribution
Expanded prohibitions on AI tools providing tailored professional advice.
- Related KPI
- Automated decisions
- Source side
- new snapshot
Verified exact source passage
“building or offering AI tools that provide others with tailored advice that requires a license, without appropriate involvement by a licensed professional. You also may not state or imply that the AI itself holds professional credentials or”
- Reason 3+2 score contribution
Clarified 'high-stakes actions' and added 'law enforcement' to restricted uses.
- Related KPI
- Automated decisions
- Source side
- new snapshot
Verified exact source passage
“automation of high-stakes actions in sensitive areas without human review. This includes actions, decisions, transactions, submissions, and other steps that materially affect a person’s rights, safety, access to essential services, or other”
Score reasons and deltaScore values are stored AI-assisted screening outputs. Verified anchors confirm only that the quoted passage occurs in the named snapshot; they do not prove the interpretation.
Advisory review map
Governance Relevance
EU AI Act
Official Journal text, 2024
Which recorded policy statements may be relevant to transparency, automated decisions, data use and human oversight review?
- AI training opt-out
- Not Available
- Algorithmic transparency
- Opaque
- Automated decisions
- Partial
- AI bias and fairness
- Absent
ISO/IEC 42001
ISO/IEC 42001:2023 overview
Which recorded policy statements may inform an AI management-system review of transparency, risk oversight and independent assurance?
- Algorithmic transparency
- Opaque
- AI bias and fairness
- Absent
- Independent audit
- Absent
- Regulatory compliance
- Comprehensive
NIST AI RMF
AI RMF 1.0; NIST revision in progress, checked 2026-07-29
Which recorded policy statements may support Govern, Map, Measure or Manage review questions?
- Algorithmic transparency
- Opaque
- Automated decisions
- Partial
- AI bias and fairness
- Absent
- Content moderation
- Opaque
OECD AI Principles
OECD AI Principles, updated 2024
Which recorded policy statements may be relevant to transparency, fairness, accountability and user agency review?
- Consent mechanism
- Implicit
- Algorithmic transparency
- Opaque
- AI bias and fairness
- Absent
- Independent audit
- Absent
Mappings identify review relevance between recorded PolicyWatcher KPI fields and framework topics. They are not legal interpretations, conformity assessments, certifications or compliance verdicts.
Exact change-bound files
Report Output
Both files are generated from this exact change ID.
Download exact-change PDF Download exact-change JSONac69e7c407d9eac1a3681769c001dab169ae978ef929218a3362d59c359ff904Questions before reuse
- Does the original Usage Policies source still match the recorded public snapshot version 2?
- Do the cited source passages support each displayed reason, KPI value and regional note?
- Which advisory framework topics require specialist legal, risk or governance review for this use case?
- Has a later public change superseded this packet before it is reused in a decision or publication?