Public Evidence Packet
Microsoft - Services Agreement
Services Agreement
9f75ba9c-8996-4a19-a3e4-9538af4d5884- Screening date
- 01 Oct 2026, 19:52 UTC
- Jurisdiction
- Global
- Risk screening
- High · 7/10
- Score trace
- +1 points from previous public change
This packet records PolicyWatcher evidence and AI-assisted screening for one public change. It is not legal advice, a compliance verdict, a certification, or proof that the external source remains unchanged.
- 01Source evidence
- 02Explainability
- 03Governance Relevance
- 04Report Output
Dataset QA · sanitized public view
Source evidence
- Publication gate
- Published
- Retrieval state
- Recorded retrieval available
- Latest retrieval
- 01 Oct 2026, 19:52 UTC
- Sanitized channel
direct- Data status
- Available
- Public snapshot evidence
- Available
Public snapshot fingerprints
d48f6898d876883fe3ccd1d259c8afada7a329cf4824b73afc4a4f785929cd24Captured 06 Aug 2026, 03:50 UTC47f9638143e130a9ce7831eb4b87c6c67e7a8cf5cd52fd10f2897e864eeb70f8Captured 01 Oct 2026, 19:52 UTCSource confidence describes recorded retrieval and publication state. It does not rate the provider policy or certify source authenticity.
Source-anchored screening trace
Explainability
Microsoft's updated Services Agreement now covers more products and services by reference, broadening its reach and potentially reducing user clarity.
- Reason 1+1 score contribution
Expanded scope of services covered by the agreement, including those not explicitly listed.
- Related KPI
- Regulatory compliance
- Source side
- new snapshot
Verified exact source passage
“and any other Microsoft consumer products, websites and services that reference these Terms”
- Reason 2+1 score contribution
Reduced clarity for users on which specific services are governed by these terms.
- Related KPI
- Consent mechanism
- Source side
- new snapshot
Verified exact source passage
“and any other Microsoft consumer products, websites and services that reference these Terms”
- Reason 30 score contribution
Minor formatting change in a URL for moderation and enforcement policies.
- Related KPI
- Algorithmic transparency
- Source side
- old snapshot
Verified exact source passage
“aka.ms/trustandsafety”
Score reasons and deltaScore values are stored AI-assisted screening outputs. Verified anchors confirm only that the quoted passage occurs in the named snapshot; they do not prove the interpretation.
Advisory review map
Governance Relevance
EU AI Act
Official Journal text, 2024
Which recorded policy statements may be relevant to transparency, automated decisions, data use and human oversight review?
- AI training opt-out
- Not Available
- Algorithmic transparency
- Opaque
- Automated decisions
- Opaque
- AI bias and fairness
- Absent
ISO/IEC 42001
ISO/IEC 42001:2023 overview
Which recorded policy statements may inform an AI management-system review of transparency, risk oversight and independent assurance?
- Algorithmic transparency
- Opaque
- AI bias and fairness
- Absent
- Independent audit
- Absent
- Regulatory compliance
- Partial
NIST AI RMF
AI RMF 1.0; NIST revision in progress, checked 2026-07-29
Which recorded policy statements may support Govern, Map, Measure or Manage review questions?
- Algorithmic transparency
- Opaque
- Automated decisions
- Opaque
- AI bias and fairness
- Absent
- Content moderation
- Partial
OECD AI Principles
OECD AI Principles, updated 2024
Which recorded policy statements may be relevant to transparency, fairness, accountability and user agency review?
- Consent mechanism
- Implicit
- Algorithmic transparency
- Opaque
- AI bias and fairness
- Absent
- Independent audit
- Absent
Mappings identify review relevance between recorded PolicyWatcher KPI fields and framework topics. They are not legal interpretations, conformity assessments, certifications or compliance verdicts.
Exact change-bound files
Report Output
Both files are generated from this exact change ID.
Download exact-change PDF Download exact-change JSONaad47300f852fcbb8ca80b1a9102220973da88bcc9abddf2ad21d4b14d035ed4Questions before reuse
- Does the original Services Agreement source still match the recorded public snapshot version 3?
- Do the cited source passages support each displayed reason, KPI value and regional note?
- Which advisory framework topics require specialist legal, risk or governance review for this use case?
- Has a later public change superseded this packet before it is reused in a decision or publication?