Public Evidence Packet
TikTok - Privacy Policy
Privacy Policy
8fee8965-4f52-4d9e-86b4-33dc60fdadd7- Screening date
- 12 Nov 2026, 22:40 UTC
- Jurisdiction
- EU
- Risk screening
- Low · 3/10
- Score trace
- -4 points from previous public change
This packet records PolicyWatcher evidence and AI-assisted screening for one public change. It is not legal advice, a compliance verdict, a certification, or proof that the external source remains unchanged.
- 01Source evidence
- 02Explainability
- 03Governance Relevance
- 04Report Output
Dataset QA · sanitized public view
Source evidence
- Publication gate
- Published
- Retrieval state
- Recorded retrieval available
- Latest retrieval
- 12 Nov 2026, 22:40 UTC
- Sanitized channel
direct- Data status
- Available
- Public snapshot evidence
- Available
Public snapshot fingerprints
3a6bbd7afaf7b77774d876a3cec3527e25a5b72f6f8556bbb89dc67d69b34a61Captured 29 Oct 2026, 14:38 UTCee13d9375db8e4f3b8ed278301fc45ea4ffd4965f492286e399580c3983cf39fCaptured 12 Nov 2026, 22:40 UTCSource confidence describes recorded retrieval and publication state. It does not rate the provider policy or certify source authenticity.
Source-anchored screening trace
Explainability
TikTok introduced a UK-specific update concerning how ads are displayed, taking effect in November 2026 or upon user choice.
- Reason 10 score contribution
Introduced targeted updates for UK ad personalization and consent triggers.
- Related KPI
- Consent mechanism
- Source side
- new snapshot
Verified exact source passage
“We are changing how we show ads to UK users. Our new Privacy Policy for UK users comes into effect on 11 November 2026 or, if you are in the UK, when you make a choice about ads.”
- Reason 20 score contribution
Broad data collection practices via device and third-party sources remain unchanged.
- Related KPI
- Data collection
- Source side
- Not recorded
Source passage not recordedThis historical reason has no recorded source passage.
- Reason 30 score contribution
Cross-border data transfers to the US, Malaysia, and Singapore continue under SCCs.
- Related KPI
- Cross-border transfer
- Source side
- Not recorded
Source passage not recordedThis historical reason has no recorded source passage.
Score reasons and deltaScore values are stored AI-assisted screening outputs. Verified anchors confirm only that the quoted passage occurs in the named snapshot; they do not prove the interpretation.
Advisory review map
Governance Relevance
EU AI Act
Official Journal text, 2024
Which recorded policy statements may be relevant to transparency, automated decisions, data use and human oversight review?
- Algorithmic transparency
- Opaque
- Automated decisions
- Opaque
- AI bias and fairness
- Mentioned
ISO/IEC 42001
ISO/IEC 42001:2023 overview
Which recorded policy statements may inform an AI management-system review of transparency, risk oversight and independent assurance?
- Algorithmic transparency
- Opaque
- AI bias and fairness
- Mentioned
- Independent audit
- Absent
- Regulatory compliance
- Comprehensive
NIST AI RMF
AI RMF 1.0; NIST revision in progress, checked 2026-07-29
Which recorded policy statements may support Govern, Map, Measure or Manage review questions?
- Algorithmic transparency
- Opaque
- Automated decisions
- Opaque
- AI bias and fairness
- Mentioned
- Content moderation
- Partial
OECD AI Principles
OECD AI Principles, updated 2024
Which recorded policy statements may be relevant to transparency, fairness, accountability and user agency review?
- Consent mechanism
- Opt-Out
- Algorithmic transparency
- Opaque
- AI bias and fairness
- Mentioned
- Independent audit
- Absent
Mappings identify review relevance between recorded PolicyWatcher KPI fields and framework topics. They are not legal interpretations, conformity assessments, certifications or compliance verdicts.
Exact change-bound files
Report Output
Both files are generated from this exact change ID.
Download exact-change PDF Download exact-change JSONbfcef92dc9dc224d188bda4c628562dd921cb8438bc5094a32d517f264b5b2fdQuestions before reuse
- Does the original Privacy Policy source still match the recorded public snapshot version 5?
- Do the cited source passages support each displayed reason, KPI value and regional note?
- Which advisory framework topics require specialist legal, risk or governance review for this use case?
- Has a later public change superseded this packet before it is reused in a decision or publication?