Public Evidence Packet
Amazon - AWS Service Terms
AWS Service Terms
8a6d7e33-63ec-46e8-9a9f-07d25b686d19- Screening date
- 15 Oct 2026, 04:41 UTC
- Jurisdiction
- Global
- Risk screening
- Medium · 6/10
- Score trace
- Baseline; no earlier public change
This packet records PolicyWatcher evidence and AI-assisted screening for one public change. It is not legal advice, a compliance verdict, a certification, or proof that the external source remains unchanged.
- 01Source evidence
- 02Explainability
- 03Governance Relevance
- 04Report Output
Dataset QA · sanitized public view
Source evidence
- Publication gate
- Published
- Retrieval state
- Recorded retrieval available
- Latest retrieval
- 22 Oct 2026, 11:38 UTC
- Sanitized channel
direct- Data status
- Available
- Public snapshot evidence
- Available
Public snapshot fingerprints
2f1c421f22a6f1cbc3ecd385c7e1ad57407b42ff9a346a296c94bf94c3334c8dCaptured 02 Oct 2026, 04:54 UTC38493fdad1820615c99e5074f1342147fcbfad5543b5a61c07ed8ac8d3d1ff45Captured 15 Oct 2026, 04:41 UTCSource confidence describes recorded retrieval and publication state. It does not rate the provider policy or certify source authenticity.
Source-anchored screening trace
Explainability
The AWS Service Terms received a minor date update with no substantive changes, maintaining existing user responsibilities and data protection frameworks.
- Reason 10 score contribution
AWS can remove content without prior notice for illegal content or service disruption.
- Related KPI
- Content moderation
- Source side
- new snapshot
Verified exact source passage
“we may remove or disable access to any Prohibited Content without prior notice in connection with illegal content, where the content may disrupt or threaten the Services or in accordance with applicable law or any judicial, regulatory or ot”
- Reason 20 score contribution
Users bear full responsibility for ensuring their AI service use complies with all applicable laws.
- Related KPI
- Regulatory compliance
- Source side
- new snapshot
Verified exact source passage
“it’s your responsibility to ensure that your use complies with all applicable laws, rules, and regulations, and the AWS Responsible AI Policy.”
- Reason 30 score contribution
Content contributed to AWS projects grants broad, irrevocable licenses to other project members.
- Related KPI
- Third-party sharing
- Source side
- new snapshot
Verified exact source passage
“Unless you enter into a license with other parties who have access to the project specifying different terms, you grant each party who has access to the project a nonexclusive, worldwide, irrevocable license to use, reproduce, prepare deriv”
Score reasons and deltaScore values are stored AI-assisted screening outputs. Verified anchors confirm only that the quoted passage occurs in the named snapshot; they do not prove the interpretation.
Advisory review map
Governance Relevance
EU AI Act
Official Journal text, 2024
Which recorded policy statements may be relevant to transparency, automated decisions, data use and human oversight review?
- AI training opt-out
- Opt-Out
- Algorithmic transparency
- Opaque
- Automated decisions
- Opaque
- AI bias and fairness
- Mentioned
ISO/IEC 42001
ISO/IEC 42001:2023 overview
Which recorded policy statements may inform an AI management-system review of transparency, risk oversight and independent assurance?
- Algorithmic transparency
- Opaque
- AI bias and fairness
- Mentioned
- Independent audit
- Absent
- Regulatory compliance
- Comprehensive
NIST AI RMF
AI RMF 1.0; NIST revision in progress, checked 2026-07-29
Which recorded policy statements may support Govern, Map, Measure or Manage review questions?
- Algorithmic transparency
- Opaque
- Automated decisions
- Opaque
- AI bias and fairness
- Mentioned
- Content moderation
- Partial
OECD AI Principles
OECD AI Principles, updated 2024
Which recorded policy statements may be relevant to transparency, fairness, accountability and user agency review?
- Consent mechanism
- Implicit
- Algorithmic transparency
- Opaque
- AI bias and fairness
- Mentioned
- Independent audit
- Absent
Mappings identify review relevance between recorded PolicyWatcher KPI fields and framework topics. They are not legal interpretations, conformity assessments, certifications or compliance verdicts.
Exact change-bound files
Report Output
Both files are generated from this exact change ID.
Download exact-change PDF Download exact-change JSONe0bb3949c499b4449f6790c44fb5c9a1da686e77044a9cd4823d3315423241b3Questions before reuse
- Does the original AWS Service Terms source still match the recorded public snapshot version 2?
- Do the cited source passages support each displayed reason, KPI value and regional note?
- Which advisory framework topics require specialist legal, risk or governance review for this use case?
- Has a later public change superseded this packet before it is reused in a decision or publication?