Public Evidence Packet

Google - Privacy Policy

Name: PolicyWatcher Evidence Packet: Google Privacy Policy
Creator: PolicyWatcher

2c167795-987c-4b85-8baa-b6ab48f37c61

Screening date: 01 Oct 2026, 19:45 UTC
Jurisdiction: US
Risk screening: High · 7/10
Score trace: +1 points from previous public change

This packet records PolicyWatcher evidence and AI-assisted screening for one public change. It is not legal advice, a compliance verdict, a certification, or proof that the external source remains unchanged.

01Source evidence
02Explainability
03Governance Relevance
04Report Output

Dataset QA · sanitized public view

Source evidence

Publication gate: Published
Retrieval state: Recorded retrieval available
Latest retrieval: 01 Oct 2026, 19:45 UTC
Sanitized channel: direct
Data status: Available
Public snapshot evidence: Available

Public snapshot fingerprints

Previous · version 261d74aa5731363bb1caa708128349f2d4096a6b1ebbce23bf55268c71461a29aCaptured 24 Jul 2026, 20:57 UTC

Current · version 33e68770c74db79945a9864618429780a62729ad217d96163fe55166b24fdc337Captured 01 Oct 2026, 19:45 UTC

Source confidence describes recorded retrieval and publication state. It does not rate the provider policy or certify source authenticity.

Source-anchored screening trace

Explainability

No changes were found between the old and new Google Privacy Policy versions, maintaining existing data collection, usage, and sharing practices.

Reason 10 score contribution
No changes detected in policy text between the old and new versions provided.
Related KPI
No related KPI recorded
Source side
Not recorded
Source passage not recorded
This historical reason has no recorded source passage.
Reason 20 score contribution
Existing data collection practices remain broad across Google's diverse services.
Related KPI
Data collection
Source side
Not recorded
Source passage not recorded
This historical reason has no recorded source passage.
Reason 30 score contribution
AI training data usage and IP licensing terms are not explicitly detailed.
Related KPI
AI training opt-out
Source side
Not recorded
Source passage not recorded
This historical reason has no recorded source passage.

Score reasons and deltaScore values are stored AI-assisted screening outputs. Verified anchors confirm only that the quoted passage occurs in the named snapshot; they do not prove the interpretation.

Advisory review map

Governance Relevance

EU AI Act

Official Journal text, 2024

Mapped evidence

Which recorded policy statements may be relevant to transparency, automated decisions, data use and human oversight review?

AI training opt-out: Opt-Out
Algorithmic transparency: Mentioned
Automated decisions: Partial
AI bias and fairness: Absent

Framework source

ISO/IEC 42001

ISO/IEC 42001:2023 overview

Mapped evidence

Which recorded policy statements may inform an AI management-system review of transparency, risk oversight and independent assurance?

Algorithmic transparency: Mentioned
AI bias and fairness: Absent
Independent audit: Absent
Regulatory compliance: Comprehensive

Framework source

NIST AI RMF

AI RMF 1.0; NIST revision in progress, checked 2026-07-29

Mapped evidence

Which recorded policy statements may support Govern, Map, Measure or Manage review questions?

Algorithmic transparency: Mentioned
Automated decisions: Partial
AI bias and fairness: Absent
Content moderation: Partial

Framework source

OECD AI Principles

OECD AI Principles, updated 2024

Mapped evidence

Which recorded policy statements may be relevant to transparency, fairness, accountability and user agency review?

Consent mechanism: Explicit Opt-In
Algorithmic transparency: Mentioned
AI bias and fairness: Absent
Independent audit: Absent

Framework source

Mappings identify review relevance between recorded PolicyWatcher KPI fields and framework topics. They are not legal interpretations, conformity assessments, certifications or compliance verdicts.

Exact change-bound files

Report Output

Both files are generated from this exact change ID.

Download exact-change PDF Download exact-change JSON

Packet content digest · SHA-256000ef6d15f62f76210010e2901792165d6acf7f753f7f862a51d696e3b30d448

Questions before reuse

Does the original Privacy Policy source still match the recorded public snapshot version 3?
Do the cited source passages support each displayed reason, KPI value and regional note?
Which advisory framework topics require specialist legal, risk or governance review for this use case?
Has a later public change superseded this packet before it is reused in a decision or publication?