Public Evidence Packet
PayPal - Privacy Statement
Privacy Statement
fefcf0ae-a694-4042-a97f-a8abe7cd08bd- Screening date
- 18 Oct 2026, 07:38 UTC
- Jurisdiction
- EU
- Risk screening
- Medium · 5/10
- Score trace
- -2 points from previous public change
This packet records PolicyWatcher evidence and AI-assisted screening for one public change. It is not legal advice, a compliance verdict, a certification, or proof that the external source remains unchanged.
- 01Source evidence
- 02Explainability
- 03Governance Relevance
- 04Report Output
Dataset QA · sanitized public view
Source evidence
- Publication gate
- Published
- Retrieval state
- Review required
- Latest retrieval
- 22 Oct 2026, 11:43 UTC
- Sanitized channel
direct- Data status
- Available
- Public snapshot evidence
- Available
Public snapshot fingerprints
1883abf1abba82e38280f0f2c62ab83be76a12e93e2c85b319f9c069b557a364Captured 09 Oct 2026, 02:46 UTC8323bbee96911722b84e4bbaf21d6828ba0d8902511b66918a5cd0fca153b5ddCaptured 18 Oct 2026, 07:38 UTCSource confidence describes recorded retrieval and publication state. It does not rate the provider policy or certify source authenticity.
Source-anchored screening trace
Explainability
This PayPal Privacy Statement update is administrative, changing only the effective date and UK office address, with no impact on user data or rights.
- Reason 10 score contribution
Policy update is administrative, changing only the effective date.
- Related KPI
- No related KPI recorded
- Source side
- old snapshot
Verified exact source passage
“Last updated on 28 September 2026”
- Reason 20 score contribution
UK registered office address updated, no impact on data processing.
- Related KPI
- No related KPI recorded
- Source side
- old snapshot
Verified exact source passage
“PayPal UK Ltd5 Fleet PlaceLondon, UK EC4M 7RD”
- Reason 30 score contribution
No changes to data collection, sharing, or user rights were identified.
- Related KPI
- No related KPI recorded
- Source side
- Not recorded
Source passage not recordedThis historical reason has no recorded source passage.
Score reasons and deltaScore values are stored AI-assisted screening outputs. Verified anchors confirm only that the quoted passage occurs in the named snapshot; they do not prove the interpretation.
Advisory review map
Governance Relevance
EU AI Act
Official Journal text, 2024
Which recorded policy statements may be relevant to transparency, automated decisions, data use and human oversight review?
- AI training opt-out
- Opt-Out
- Algorithmic transparency
- Mentioned
- Automated decisions
- Partial
- AI bias and fairness
- Absent
ISO/IEC 42001
ISO/IEC 42001:2023 overview
Which recorded policy statements may inform an AI management-system review of transparency, risk oversight and independent assurance?
- Algorithmic transparency
- Mentioned
- AI bias and fairness
- Absent
- Independent audit
- Absent
- Regulatory compliance
- Comprehensive
NIST AI RMF
AI RMF 1.0; NIST revision in progress, checked 2026-07-29
Which recorded policy statements may support Govern, Map, Measure or Manage review questions?
- Algorithmic transparency
- Mentioned
- Automated decisions
- Partial
- AI bias and fairness
- Absent
OECD AI Principles
OECD AI Principles, updated 2024
Which recorded policy statements may be relevant to transparency, fairness, accountability and user agency review?
- Consent mechanism
- Explicit Opt-In
- Algorithmic transparency
- Mentioned
- AI bias and fairness
- Absent
- Independent audit
- Absent
Mappings identify review relevance between recorded PolicyWatcher KPI fields and framework topics. They are not legal interpretations, conformity assessments, certifications or compliance verdicts.
Exact change-bound files
Report Output
Both files are generated from this exact change ID.
Download exact-change PDF Download exact-change JSON19417088ac608528bdf3c6a37dc51c673c77c7403374e3caf856d9ce47bb355cQuestions before reuse
- Does the original Privacy Statement source still match the recorded public snapshot version 11?
- Do the cited source passages support each displayed reason, KPI value and regional note?
- Which advisory framework topics require specialist legal, risk or governance review for this use case?
- Has a later public change superseded this packet before it is reused in a decision or publication?