PolicyWatcherPublic evidence laboratory

Public Evidence Packet

Meta - Privacy Policy

Privacy Policy

effbc552-bf79-49fc-958d-a5ef4407de76
Screening date
06 Jul 2026, 22:10 UTC
Jurisdiction
EU
Risk screening
Medium · 6/10
Score trace
Baseline; no earlier public change

This packet records PolicyWatcher evidence and AI-assisted screening for one public change. It is not legal advice, a compliance verdict, a certification, or proof that the external source remains unchanged.

  1. 01Source evidence
  2. 02Explainability
  3. 03Governance Relevance
  4. 04Report Output
01

Dataset QA · sanitized public view

Source evidence

Publication gate
Published
Retrieval state
Recorded retrieval available
Latest retrieval
04 Nov 2026, 18:41 UTC
Sanitized channel
direct
Data status
Available
Public snapshot evidence
Available

Public snapshot fingerprints

Previous · version 185be72dc93337f4175a73ea90c24f7cde5f8fea9be17d3221acba55327f5499bCaptured 06 Jul 2026, 07:20 UTC
Current · version 252164a545dbe7a8d2468fdc70157cf96f334218f3157404e271267a6f71d9f8cCaptured 06 Jul 2026, 22:10 UTC

Source confidence describes recorded retrieval and publication state. It does not rate the provider policy or certify source authenticity.

02

Source-anchored screening trace

Explainability

Meta's updated policy details expanded AI use for content creation and personalization, adds specific EU legal bases, and includes new safeguards for minors.

  1. Reason 1+2 score contribution

    User content explicitly used for AI training and content generation.

    Related KPI
    No related KPI recorded
    Source side
    Not recorded
    Source passage not recorded

    This historical reason has no recorded source passage.

  2. Reason 2+1 score contribution

    No explicit opt-out for user content used in AI training.

    Related KPI
    No related KPI recorded
    Source side
    Not recorded
    Source passage not recorded

    This historical reason has no recorded source passage.

  3. Reason 3+1 score contribution

    Continues broad data collection for personalization and targeted ads.

    Related KPI
    No related KPI recorded
    Source side
    Not recorded
    Source passage not recorded

    This historical reason has no recorded source passage.

Score reasons and deltaScore values are stored AI-assisted screening outputs. Verified anchors confirm only that the quoted passage occurs in the named snapshot; they do not prove the interpretation.

03

Advisory review map

Governance Relevance

EU AI Act

Official Journal text, 2024

Not assessed

Which recorded policy statements may be relevant to transparency, automated decisions, data use and human oversight review?

No assessed KPI value is available for this advisory mapping.

Framework source

ISO/IEC 42001

ISO/IEC 42001:2023 overview

Not assessed

Which recorded policy statements may inform an AI management-system review of transparency, risk oversight and independent assurance?

No assessed KPI value is available for this advisory mapping.

Framework source

NIST AI RMF

AI RMF 1.0; NIST revision in progress, checked 2026-07-29

Not assessed

Which recorded policy statements may support Govern, Map, Measure or Manage review questions?

No assessed KPI value is available for this advisory mapping.

Framework source

OECD AI Principles

OECD AI Principles, updated 2024

Not assessed

Which recorded policy statements may be relevant to transparency, fairness, accountability and user agency review?

No assessed KPI value is available for this advisory mapping.

Framework source

Mappings identify review relevance between recorded PolicyWatcher KPI fields and framework topics. They are not legal interpretations, conformity assessments, certifications or compliance verdicts.

04

Exact change-bound files

Report Output

Both files are generated from this exact change ID.

Download exact-change PDF Download exact-change JSON
Packet content digest · SHA-256397d898891f8873b436cc98ba49fcf0ed9c91ea8635b702e3465705a74fc460c

Questions before reuse

  1. Does the original Privacy Policy source still match the recorded public snapshot version 2?
  2. Do the cited source passages support each displayed reason, KPI value and regional note?
  3. Which advisory framework topics require specialist legal, risk or governance review for this use case?
  4. Has a later public change superseded this packet before it is reused in a decision or publication?