PolicyWatcherPublic evidence laboratory

Public Evidence Packet

PayPal - Privacy Statement

Privacy Statement

e7bcfc89-09cc-4133-b686-84efac485e51
Screening date
18 Oct 2026, 07:39 UTC
Jurisdiction
US
Risk screening
Low · 2/10
Score trace
-5 points from previous public change

This packet records PolicyWatcher evidence and AI-assisted screening for one public change. It is not legal advice, a compliance verdict, a certification, or proof that the external source remains unchanged.

  1. 01Source evidence
  2. 02Explainability
  3. 03Governance Relevance
  4. 04Report Output
01

Dataset QA · sanitized public view

Source evidence

Publication gate
Published
Retrieval state
Review required
Latest retrieval
22 Oct 2026, 11:43 UTC
Sanitized channel
direct
Data status
Available
Public snapshot evidence
Available

Public snapshot fingerprints

Previous · version 104594897afb9c019070eab6f20914b54c3b15bd2ed19d39e6591bd521840b944fCaptured 09 Oct 2026, 02:47 UTC
Current · version 116675d7186466d6b8e56d49e0d361fb8438095a384749fe059a30acdd9f660d39Captured 18 Oct 2026, 07:39 UTC

Source confidence describes recorded retrieval and publication state. It does not rate the provider policy or certify source authenticity.

02

Source-anchored screening trace

Explainability

PayPal updated its UK registered office address and contact information with no changes to core data rights or AI usage.

  1. Reason 10 score contribution

    Update is limited to administrative address changes for UK operations.

    Related KPI
    Regulatory compliance
    Source side
    new snapshot
    Verified exact source passage

    “PayPal UK Ltd76 Upper GroundLondon, United Kingdom, SE1 9PZContact Online for Privacy queries”

  2. Reason 20 score contribution

    Data retention periods and biometric storage policies remain identical.

    Related KPI
    Data retention
    Source side
    Not recorded
    Source passage not recorded

    This historical reason has no recorded source passage.

  3. Reason 30 score contribution

    Cross-border data transfer mechanisms and safeguards are unchanged.

    Related KPI
    Cross-border transfer
    Source side
    Not recorded
    Source passage not recorded

    This historical reason has no recorded source passage.

Score reasons and deltaScore values are stored AI-assisted screening outputs. Verified anchors confirm only that the quoted passage occurs in the named snapshot; they do not prove the interpretation.

03

Advisory review map

Governance Relevance

EU AI Act

Official Journal text, 2024

Mapped evidence

Which recorded policy statements may be relevant to transparency, automated decisions, data use and human oversight review?

Algorithmic transparency
Opaque
Automated decisions
Opaque
AI bias and fairness
Mentioned
Framework source

ISO/IEC 42001

ISO/IEC 42001:2023 overview

Mapped evidence

Which recorded policy statements may inform an AI management-system review of transparency, risk oversight and independent assurance?

Algorithmic transparency
Opaque
AI bias and fairness
Mentioned
Independent audit
Absent
Regulatory compliance
Comprehensive
Framework source

NIST AI RMF

AI RMF 1.0; NIST revision in progress, checked 2026-07-29

Mapped evidence

Which recorded policy statements may support Govern, Map, Measure or Manage review questions?

Algorithmic transparency
Opaque
Automated decisions
Opaque
AI bias and fairness
Mentioned
Framework source

OECD AI Principles

OECD AI Principles, updated 2024

Mapped evidence

Which recorded policy statements may be relevant to transparency, fairness, accountability and user agency review?

Consent mechanism
Explicit Opt-In
Algorithmic transparency
Opaque
AI bias and fairness
Mentioned
Independent audit
Absent
Framework source

Mappings identify review relevance between recorded PolicyWatcher KPI fields and framework topics. They are not legal interpretations, conformity assessments, certifications or compliance verdicts.

04

Exact change-bound files

Report Output

Both files are generated from this exact change ID.

Download exact-change PDF Download exact-change JSON
Packet content digest · SHA-2569de7edcde11917e876484412be5d668ff079a7c82c07b43dfdfd1a8ec10b6300

Questions before reuse

  1. Does the original Privacy Statement source still match the recorded public snapshot version 11?
  2. Do the cited source passages support each displayed reason, KPI value and regional note?
  3. Which advisory framework topics require specialist legal, risk or governance review for this use case?
  4. Has a later public change superseded this packet before it is reused in a decision or publication?