Public Evidence Packet
Zoom - Privacy Statement
Privacy Statement
deed3507-de9d-4d32-a03a-a43b250f9a21- Screening date
- 24 Sept 2026, 16:32 UTC
- Jurisdiction
- Global
- Risk screening
- Medium · 7/10
- Score trace
- +3 points from previous public change
This packet records PolicyWatcher evidence and AI-assisted screening for one public change. It is not legal advice, a compliance verdict, a certification, or proof that the external source remains unchanged.
- 01Source evidence
- 02Explainability
- 03Governance Relevance
- 04Report Output
Dataset QA · sanitized public view
Source evidence
- Publication gate
- Published
- Retrieval state
- Recorded retrieval available
- Latest retrieval
- 24 Sept 2026, 16:32 UTC
- Sanitized channel
direct- Data status
- Available
- Public snapshot evidence
- Available
Public snapshot fingerprints
ae8f30d854f985a13f13d7e11a5efa5bf4d6f06927e5cefe9b60979ea986ba57Captured 28 Jul 2026, 22:39 UTCfc85564f79365a46b8ad700c95c6445840426d47b79b0bb1e951fd863d1cf8afCaptured 24 Sept 2026, 16:32 UTCSource confidence describes recorded retrieval and publication state. It does not rate the provider policy or certify source authenticity.
Source-anchored screening trace
Explainability
The Zoom Privacy Statement was updated with a new date, but no actual policy changes were found, meaning existing data practices continue.
- Reason 10 score contribution
Extensive data collection across many categories remains unchanged.
- Related KPI
- Data collection
- Source side
- Not recorded
Source passage not recordedThis historical reason has no recorded source passage.
- Reason 20 score contribution
Broad sharing with various third parties, including marketing partners, persists.
- Related KPI
- Third-party sharing
- Source side
- Not recorded
Source passage not recordedThis historical reason has no recorded source passage.
- Reason 30 score contribution
Account owners retain significant control over user data and settings.
- Related KPI
- Automated decisions
- Source side
- old snapshot
Verified exact source passage
“Account Owner: An account owner is the organization or individual that signs up for a Zoom account. Typically, an account owner designates one or more people (called an “administrator”) to manage their account and can grant privileges to us”
Score reasons and deltaScore values are stored AI-assisted screening outputs. Verified anchors confirm only that the quoted passage occurs in the named snapshot; they do not prove the interpretation.
Advisory review map
Governance Relevance
EU AI Act
Official Journal text, 2024
Which recorded policy statements may be relevant to transparency, automated decisions, data use and human oversight review?
- AI training opt-out
- Available
- Algorithmic transparency
- Mentioned
- AI bias and fairness
- Absent
ISO/IEC 42001
ISO/IEC 42001:2023 overview
Which recorded policy statements may inform an AI management-system review of transparency, risk oversight and independent assurance?
- Algorithmic transparency
- Mentioned
- AI bias and fairness
- Absent
- Independent audit
- Absent
- Regulatory compliance
- Comprehensive
NIST AI RMF
AI RMF 1.0; NIST revision in progress, checked 2026-07-29
Which recorded policy statements may support Govern, Map, Measure or Manage review questions?
- Algorithmic transparency
- Mentioned
- AI bias and fairness
- Absent
- Content moderation
- Opaque
OECD AI Principles
OECD AI Principles, updated 2024
Which recorded policy statements may be relevant to transparency, fairness, accountability and user agency review?
- Consent mechanism
- Explicit Opt-In
- Algorithmic transparency
- Mentioned
- AI bias and fairness
- Absent
- Independent audit
- Absent
Mappings identify review relevance between recorded PolicyWatcher KPI fields and framework topics. They are not legal interpretations, conformity assessments, certifications or compliance verdicts.
Exact change-bound files
Report Output
Both files are generated from this exact change ID.
Download exact-change PDF Download exact-change JSON97587447f383acc9e992a2847e52d28b7536a595069b484b16169f450037e7b3Questions before reuse
- Does the original Privacy Statement source still match the recorded public snapshot version 3?
- Do the cited source passages support each displayed reason, KPI value and regional note?
- Which advisory framework topics require specialist legal, risk or governance review for this use case?
- Has a later public change superseded this packet before it is reused in a decision or publication?