PolicyWatcherPublic evidence laboratory

Public Evidence Packet

Amazon - AWS Site Terms

AWS Site Terms

a9ac5b65-35b3-4c60-92a6-419ccc298f49
Screening date
28 Oct 2026, 13:39 UTC
Jurisdiction
Global
Risk screening
Medium · 6/10
Score trace
Baseline; no earlier public change

This packet records PolicyWatcher evidence and AI-assisted screening for one public change. It is not legal advice, a compliance verdict, a certification, or proof that the external source remains unchanged.

  1. 01Source evidence
  2. 02Explainability
  3. 03Governance Relevance
  4. 04Report Output
01

Dataset QA · sanitized public view

Source evidence

Publication gate
Published
Retrieval state
Recorded retrieval available
Latest retrieval
28 Oct 2026, 13:39 UTC
Sanitized channel
direct
Data status
Available
Public snapshot evidence
Available

Public snapshot fingerprints

Previous · version 15b7aa33e84c556339d414f7f4440d9edf175a7d465383d073bba7bfb74c986afCaptured 02 Oct 2026, 04:54 UTC
Current · version 2e2c8c94eaff4b74f6b41b12f15912d026f4a58872056686431917fb1bdf7d4d6Captured 28 Oct 2026, 13:39 UTC

Source confidence describes recorded retrieval and publication state. It does not rate the provider policy or certify source authenticity.

02

Source-anchored screening trace

Explainability

The AWS Site Terms are unchanged, maintaining existing rules for site access, content, and liability, with a future update date.

  1. Reason 10 score contribution

    Broad license granted for user-submitted content, including derivative works.

    Related KPI
    AI output ownership
    Source side
    old snapshot
    Verified exact source passage

    “you grant AWS a nonexclusive, royalty-free, perpetual, irrevocable, and fully sublicensable right to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, and display such content throughout the world”

  2. Reason 20 score contribution

    Extensive disclaimers of warranties and limitations of liability for site use.

    Related KPI
    Regulatory compliance
    Source side
    Not recorded
    Source passage not recorded

    This historical reason has no recorded source passage.

  3. Reason 30 score contribution

    All disputes are subject to exclusive jurisdiction in Washington state courts.

    Related KPI
    Regulatory compliance
    Source side
    old snapshot
    Verified exact source passage

    “shall be adjudicated in any state or federal court in King County, Washington, and you consent to exclusive jurisdiction and venue in such courts.”

Score reasons and deltaScore values are stored AI-assisted screening outputs. Verified anchors confirm only that the quoted passage occurs in the named snapshot; they do not prove the interpretation.

03

Advisory review map

Governance Relevance

EU AI Act

Official Journal text, 2024

Mapped evidence

Which recorded policy statements may be relevant to transparency, automated decisions, data use and human oversight review?

AI training opt-out
Not Available
Algorithmic transparency
Opaque
Automated decisions
Opaque
AI bias and fairness
Absent
Framework source

ISO/IEC 42001

ISO/IEC 42001:2023 overview

Mapped evidence

Which recorded policy statements may inform an AI management-system review of transparency, risk oversight and independent assurance?

Algorithmic transparency
Opaque
AI bias and fairness
Absent
Independent audit
Absent
Regulatory compliance
Partial
Framework source

NIST AI RMF

AI RMF 1.0; NIST revision in progress, checked 2026-07-29

Mapped evidence

Which recorded policy statements may support Govern, Map, Measure or Manage review questions?

Algorithmic transparency
Opaque
Automated decisions
Opaque
AI bias and fairness
Absent
Content moderation
Partial
Framework source

OECD AI Principles

OECD AI Principles, updated 2024

Mapped evidence

Which recorded policy statements may be relevant to transparency, fairness, accountability and user agency review?

Consent mechanism
Implicit
Algorithmic transparency
Opaque
AI bias and fairness
Absent
Independent audit
Absent
Framework source

Mappings identify review relevance between recorded PolicyWatcher KPI fields and framework topics. They are not legal interpretations, conformity assessments, certifications or compliance verdicts.

04

Exact change-bound files

Report Output

Both files are generated from this exact change ID.

Download exact-change PDF Download exact-change JSON
Packet content digest · SHA-2565135aaa39181f36e82655a68d9a95b1e2676f4f018e200ec8cc101349226dfa9

Questions before reuse

  1. Does the original AWS Site Terms source still match the recorded public snapshot version 2?
  2. Do the cited source passages support each displayed reason, KPI value and regional note?
  3. Which advisory framework topics require specialist legal, risk or governance review for this use case?
  4. Has a later public change superseded this packet before it is reused in a decision or publication?