Public Evidence Packet
Anthropic - Promotion Credit Terms
Promotion Credit Terms
8db6420b-b6a5-4992-9736-e4944be01b5f- Screening date
- 22 Oct 2026, 11:42 UTC
- Jurisdiction
- Global
- Risk screening
- Medium · 6/10
- Score trace
- Baseline; no earlier public change
This packet records PolicyWatcher evidence and AI-assisted screening for one public change. It is not legal advice, a compliance verdict, a certification, or proof that the external source remains unchanged.
- 01Source evidence
- 02Explainability
- 03Governance Relevance
- 04Report Output
Dataset QA · sanitized public view
Source evidence
- Publication gate
- Published
- Retrieval state
- Recorded retrieval available
- Latest retrieval
- 22 Oct 2026, 11:42 UTC
- Sanitized channel
direct- Data status
- Available
- Public snapshot evidence
- Available
Public snapshot fingerprints
7f8421461836305dd04bfbebd004c4f07ff31ba826e8cce94cf17315b57dff05Captured 02 Oct 2026, 04:55 UTC0331436b0f2bebf595e23357e31248ec17cf1b2b74ed436ab9e49426cd132383Captured 22 Oct 2026, 11:42 UTCSource confidence describes recorded retrieval and publication state. It does not rate the provider policy or certify source authenticity.
Source-anchored screening trace
Explainability
The policy update is minor, adding only a section header; all terms for promotional credits remain unchanged.
- Reason 1+2 score contribution
Company can modify/terminate offers without notice.
- Related KPI
- Regulatory compliance
- Source side
- old snapshot
Verified exact source passage
“Anthropic may modify, suspend, or terminate this Offer at any time without notice, and may revoke Credit or disqualify participants where it determines there has been fraud, abuse, or violation of these terms.”
- Reason 2+1 score contribution
Credit is forfeited under several user-initiated or company-initiated conditions.
- Related KPI
- Data retention
- Source side
- old snapshot
Verified exact source passage
“Unless otherwise stated, Credit is forfeited if you cancel your subscription or seat, downgrade to a free plan, or if your account or user is suspended or terminated.”
- Reason 3+1 score contribution
Anthropic's decisions on eligibility and credit amounts are final.
- Related KPI
- Automated decisions
- Source side
- old snapshot
Verified exact source passage
“Anthropic’s determination of eligibility, completion, and Credit amounts is final.”
Score reasons and deltaScore values are stored AI-assisted screening outputs. Verified anchors confirm only that the quoted passage occurs in the named snapshot; they do not prove the interpretation.
Advisory review map
Governance Relevance
EU AI Act
Official Journal text, 2024
Which recorded policy statements may be relevant to transparency, automated decisions, data use and human oversight review?
- Automated decisions
- Opaque
- AI bias and fairness
- Absent
ISO/IEC 42001
ISO/IEC 42001:2023 overview
Which recorded policy statements may inform an AI management-system review of transparency, risk oversight and independent assurance?
- AI bias and fairness
- Absent
- Independent audit
- Absent
- Regulatory compliance
- Partial
NIST AI RMF
AI RMF 1.0; NIST revision in progress, checked 2026-07-29
Which recorded policy statements may support Govern, Map, Measure or Manage review questions?
- Automated decisions
- Opaque
- AI bias and fairness
- Absent
OECD AI Principles
OECD AI Principles, updated 2024
Which recorded policy statements may be relevant to transparency, fairness, accountability and user agency review?
- AI bias and fairness
- Absent
- Independent audit
- Absent
Mappings identify review relevance between recorded PolicyWatcher KPI fields and framework topics. They are not legal interpretations, conformity assessments, certifications or compliance verdicts.
Exact change-bound files
Report Output
Both files are generated from this exact change ID.
Download exact-change PDF Download exact-change JSON0a58602a3830a5546e15cbff9cdf703b33eefd93c01cae1ac423930921bd6f4aQuestions before reuse
- Does the original Promotion Credit Terms source still match the recorded public snapshot version 2?
- Do the cited source passages support each displayed reason, KPI value and regional note?
- Which advisory framework topics require specialist legal, risk or governance review for this use case?
- Has a later public change superseded this packet before it is reused in a decision or publication?