PolicyWatcherPublic evidence laboratory

Public Evidence Packet

Wise - Terms of Use

Terms of Use

83267f34-6e62-47d2-a79e-e19dc4479cc5
Screening date
01 Oct 2026, 19:53 UTC
Jurisdiction
Global
Risk screening
Medium · 4/10
Score trace
-3 points from previous public change

This packet records PolicyWatcher evidence and AI-assisted screening for one public change. It is not legal advice, a compliance verdict, a certification, or proof that the external source remains unchanged.

  1. 01Source evidence
  2. 02Explainability
  3. 03Governance Relevance
  4. 04Report Output
01

Dataset QA · sanitized public view

Source evidence

Publication gate
Published
Retrieval state
Recorded retrieval available
Latest retrieval
01 Oct 2026, 19:53 UTC
Sanitized channel
direct
Data status
Available
Public snapshot evidence
Available

Public snapshot fingerprints

Previous · version 2f82ed7b015214f0190e8a5364a9faf3e3cd2f086cf65014624d4761cb5f3dbfbCaptured 28 Jul 2026, 22:44 UTC
Current · version 31dc7bf474cdba28eb54ecb2bd0c3b4b072dc65e288d4715b8348bbb0d00564b4Captured 01 Oct 2026, 19:53 UTC

Source confidence describes recorded retrieval and publication state. It does not rate the provider policy or certify source authenticity.

02

Source-anchored screening trace

Explainability

The updated Wise Terms of Use clarify prohibited actions, improving transparency without introducing major new restrictions or changes to data practices.

  1. Reason 1+1 score contribution

    Policy now fully details actions that circumvent terms, enhancing user understanding.

    Related KPI
    Regulatory compliance
    Source side
    new snapshot
    Verified exact source passage

    “Circumventing this Agreement or any Additional Document or Wise policy or determinations about your Wise Account such as temporary or indefinite suspensions or other account holds, limitations or restrictions, including, but not limited to,”

  2. Reason 2-1 score contribution

    Extensive personal data collection for identity verification and transaction processing.

    Related KPI
    Data collection
    Source side
    new snapshot
    Verified exact source passage

    “We are required by law to conduct certain security and customer due diligence checks on you to provide any Services to you and allow you to have and maintain a Wise Account. Sometimes, we might also need to perform checks on other parties i”

  3. Reason 3-1 score contribution

    Data sharing with third parties for service operation, verification, and legal compliance.

    Related KPI
    Third-party sharing
    Source side
    new snapshot
    Verified exact source passage

    “We will disclose information to third parties about your account or the transfers you make: (i) where it is necessary for completing transfers, or (ii) in order to verify the existence and condition of your account for a third party, such a”

Score reasons and deltaScore values are stored AI-assisted screening outputs. Verified anchors confirm only that the quoted passage occurs in the named snapshot; they do not prove the interpretation.

03

Advisory review map

Governance Relevance

EU AI Act

Official Journal text, 2024

Mapped evidence

Which recorded policy statements may be relevant to transparency, automated decisions, data use and human oversight review?

AI training opt-out
Not Available
Algorithmic transparency
Opaque
Automated decisions
Opaque
AI bias and fairness
Absent
Framework source

ISO/IEC 42001

ISO/IEC 42001:2023 overview

Mapped evidence

Which recorded policy statements may inform an AI management-system review of transparency, risk oversight and independent assurance?

Algorithmic transparency
Opaque
AI bias and fairness
Absent
Independent audit
Absent
Regulatory compliance
Comprehensive
Framework source

NIST AI RMF

AI RMF 1.0; NIST revision in progress, checked 2026-07-29

Mapped evidence

Which recorded policy statements may support Govern, Map, Measure or Manage review questions?

Algorithmic transparency
Opaque
Automated decisions
Opaque
AI bias and fairness
Absent
Framework source

OECD AI Principles

OECD AI Principles, updated 2024

Mapped evidence

Which recorded policy statements may be relevant to transparency, fairness, accountability and user agency review?

Consent mechanism
Implicit
Algorithmic transparency
Opaque
AI bias and fairness
Absent
Independent audit
Absent
Framework source

Mappings identify review relevance between recorded PolicyWatcher KPI fields and framework topics. They are not legal interpretations, conformity assessments, certifications or compliance verdicts.

04

Exact change-bound files

Report Output

Both files are generated from this exact change ID.

Download exact-change PDF Download exact-change JSON
Packet content digest · SHA-25697058f49858313d5687d6805f77f4883da919944ea47a2dce6d49658c394ae65

Questions before reuse

  1. Does the original Terms of Use source still match the recorded public snapshot version 3?
  2. Do the cited source passages support each displayed reason, KPI value and regional note?
  3. Which advisory framework topics require specialist legal, risk or governance review for this use case?
  4. Has a later public change superseded this packet before it is reused in a decision or publication?