Public Evidence Packet
PayPal - Acceptable Use Policy
Acceptable Use Policy
7f57cc5f-f61d-456d-81e8-3f0c281620ca- Screening date
- 05 Nov 2026, 18:39 UTC
- Jurisdiction
- US
- Risk screening
- High · 7/10
- Score trace
- Baseline; no earlier public change
This packet records PolicyWatcher evidence and AI-assisted screening for one public change. It is not legal advice, a compliance verdict, a certification, or proof that the external source remains unchanged.
- 01Source evidence
- 02Explainability
- 03Governance Relevance
- 04Report Output
Dataset QA · sanitized public view
Source evidence
- Publication gate
- Published
- Retrieval state
- Recorded retrieval available
- Latest retrieval
- 05 Nov 2026, 18:39 UTC
- Sanitized channel
direct- Data status
- Available
- Public snapshot evidence
- Available
Public snapshot fingerprints
3c6806655dbf162cea60b322eccf95a040bfbc535ae6264861e38bca422e78ccCaptured 02 Oct 2026, 04:56 UTCd8787e9d7a60f2f2688e499303f862f0cd5f0aa4135c18d439b270c00e9de594Captured 05 Nov 2026, 18:39 UTCSource confidence describes recorded retrieval and publication state. It does not rate the provider policy or certify source authenticity.
Source-anchored screening trace
Explainability
PayPal's updated policy significantly broadens its ban on discriminatory activities, now explicitly prohibiting engagement in or celebration of hate.
- Reason 1+1 score contribution
New clause broadens prohibited discriminatory activities.
- Related KPI
- Content moderation
- Source side
- new snapshot
Verified exact source passage
“(f) the engagement in, or the encouragement, promotion, or celebration of, violence or discriminatory activity based on race, religion, disability, gender, sexual orientation, national origin, or any characteristic protected under applicabl”
- Reason 2+1 score contribution
Expanded scope of actions now prohibited (engagement, celebration).
- Related KPI
- Content moderation
- Source side
- new snapshot
Verified exact source passage
“(f) the engagement in, or the encouragement, promotion, or celebration of, violence or discriminatory activity based on race, religion, disability, gender, sexual orientation, national origin, or any characteristic protected under applicabl”
- Reason 30 score contribution
Extensive list of activities requiring pre-approval for businesses.
- Related KPI
- Regulatory compliance
- Source side
- Not recorded
Source passage not recordedThis historical reason has no recorded source passage.
Score reasons and deltaScore values are stored AI-assisted screening outputs. Verified anchors confirm only that the quoted passage occurs in the named snapshot; they do not prove the interpretation.
Advisory review map
Governance Relevance
EU AI Act
Official Journal text, 2024
Which recorded policy statements may be relevant to transparency, automated decisions, data use and human oversight review?
No assessed KPI value is available for this advisory mapping.
Framework sourceISO/IEC 42001
ISO/IEC 42001:2023 overview
Which recorded policy statements may inform an AI management-system review of transparency, risk oversight and independent assurance?
- Regulatory compliance
- Comprehensive
NIST AI RMF
AI RMF 1.0; NIST revision in progress, checked 2026-07-29
Which recorded policy statements may support Govern, Map, Measure or Manage review questions?
- Content moderation
- Opaque
OECD AI Principles
OECD AI Principles, updated 2024
Which recorded policy statements may be relevant to transparency, fairness, accountability and user agency review?
No assessed KPI value is available for this advisory mapping.
Framework sourceMappings identify review relevance between recorded PolicyWatcher KPI fields and framework topics. They are not legal interpretations, conformity assessments, certifications or compliance verdicts.
Exact change-bound files
Report Output
Both files are generated from this exact change ID.
Download exact-change PDF Download exact-change JSONfdb17b7d39f7193049dadb364649b364d9968c87eaa66a77fc002ee1e40bad2cQuestions before reuse
- Does the original Acceptable Use Policy source still match the recorded public snapshot version 2?
- Do the cited source passages support each displayed reason, KPI value and regional note?
- Which advisory framework topics require specialist legal, risk or governance review for this use case?
- Has a later public change superseded this packet before it is reused in a decision or publication?