Public Evidence Packet
Meta
Privacy Policy
7d60dfa9-f444-46e9-972a-e1679643fa6e- Screening date
- 07 Jul 2026, 02:39 UTC
- Jurisdiction
- EU
- Risk screening
- High · 8/10
- Score trace
- 0 points; unchanged
This packet records PolicyWatcher evidence and AI-assisted screening for one public change. It is not legal advice, a compliance verdict, a certification, or proof that the external source remains unchanged.
- 01Source Confidence
- 02Explainability
- 03Governance Relevance
- 04Report Output
Dataset QA · sanitized public view
Source Confidence
- Publication gate
- Published
- Retrieval state
- Review required
- Latest retrieval
- 06 Jul 2026, 03:59 UTC
- Sanitized channel
seeded- Data status
- Available
- Public snapshot evidence
- Available
Public snapshot fingerprints
9c785dc13c6976d29569fd221c435e1277e0fbe12fad803f4b1b69392652504bCaptured 06 Jul 2026, 22:26 UTC52164a545dbe7a8d2468fdc70157cf96f334218f3157404e271267a6f71d9f8cCaptured 07 Jul 2026, 02:39 UTCSource confidence describes recorded retrieval and publication state. It does not rate the provider policy or certify source authenticity.
Source-anchored screening trace
Explainability
Meta's new policy broadens AI data use and sharing with third parties, increasing privacy risks despite improved legal transparency for EU users.
- Reason 1+2 score contribution
Expanded AI data use for personalization and third-party sharing.
- Related KPI
- No related KPI recorded
- Source side
- Not recorded
Source passage not recordedThis historical reason has no recorded source passage.
- Reason 2+1 score contribution
Broad data sharing with authorities, now with specific legal citations.
- Related KPI
- No related KPI recorded
- Source side
- Not recorded
Source passage not recordedThis historical reason has no recorded source passage.
- Reason 3+1 score contribution
Lack of clear user opt-out for general AI training data.
- Related KPI
- No related KPI recorded
- Source side
- Not recorded
Source passage not recordedThis historical reason has no recorded source passage.
Score reasons and deltaScore values are stored AI-assisted screening outputs. Verified anchors confirm only that the quoted passage occurs in the named snapshot; they do not prove the interpretation.
Advisory review map
Governance Relevance
EU AI Act
Official Journal text, 2024
Which recorded policy statements may be relevant to transparency, automated decisions, data use and human oversight review?
- AI training opt-out
- Not Available
- Algorithmic transparency
- Opaque
- Automated decisions
- Opaque
- AI bias and fairness
- Mentioned
ISO/IEC 42001
ISO/IEC 42001:2023 overview
Which recorded policy statements may inform an AI management-system review of transparency, risk oversight and independent assurance?
- Algorithmic transparency
- Opaque
- AI bias and fairness
- Mentioned
- Independent audit
- Absent
- Regulatory compliance
- Comprehensive
NIST AI RMF
AI RMF 1.0; NIST revision in progress, checked 2026-07-29
Which recorded policy statements may support Govern, Map, Measure or Manage review questions?
Exact change-bound files
Report Output
Both files are generated from this exact change ID.
Download exact-change PDF Download exact-change JSONf6d56f106b6c4915a63ac3266b86c4a25ea545b6d03014b4a4da551fd4430c38Questions before reuse
- Does the original Privacy Policy source still match the recorded public snapshot version 4?
- Do the cited source passages support each displayed reason, KPI value and regional note?
- Which advisory framework topics require specialist legal, risk or governance review for this use case?
- Has a later public change superseded this packet before it is reused in a decision or publication?