Public Evidence Packet
OpenAI - Privacy Policy
Privacy Policy
79e18fd1-c585-4cbd-a32c-e456bfd142f5- Screening date
- 09 Oct 2026, 02:45 UTC
- Jurisdiction
- EU
- Risk screening
- High · 7/10
- Score trace
- 0 points; unchanged
This packet records PolicyWatcher evidence and AI-assisted screening for one public change. It is not legal advice, a compliance verdict, a certification, or proof that the external source remains unchanged.
- 01Source evidence
- 02Explainability
- 03Governance Relevance
- 04Report Output
Dataset QA · sanitized public view
Source evidence
- Publication gate
- Published
- Retrieval state
- Recorded retrieval available
- Latest retrieval
- 09 Oct 2026, 02:45 UTC
- Sanitized channel
direct- Data status
- Available
- Public snapshot evidence
- Available
Public snapshot fingerprints
2f2f693d8e75320f5079f1160cb3ed5343f2f9bec082c4afea1762928ea09e32Captured 24 Sept 2026, 16:32 UTCda5ee101be311da6c45cb1dd8817e00f678677d5e71166c24059a19ec4336ff1Captured 09 Oct 2026, 02:45 UTCSource confidence describes recorded retrieval and publication state. It does not rate the provider policy or certify source authenticity.
Source-anchored screening trace
Explainability
This OpenAI Privacy Policy update shows no changes, maintaining extensive data collection, broad sharing, and conditional data retention practices.
- Reason 10 score contribution
Extensive collection of user content, usage, device, and third-party data.
- Related KPI
- Data collection
- Source side
- Not recorded
Source passage not recordedThis historical reason has no recorded source passage.
- Reason 20 score contribution
Broad data sharing with numerous third parties, affiliates, and for business transfers.
- Related KPI
- Third-party sharing
- Source side
- Not recorded
Source passage not recordedThis historical reason has no recorded source passage.
- Reason 30 score contribution
Vague retention clauses allow extended data storage for 'legitimate' reasons.
- Related KPI
- Data retention
- Source side
- old snapshot
Verified exact source passage
“In some cases, we need to retain Personal Data for longer even after you delete it, for example because we are legally required to, to address fraud and abuse, for security reasons, or for financial record-keeping purposes.”
Score reasons and deltaScore values are stored AI-assisted screening outputs. Verified anchors confirm only that the quoted passage occurs in the named snapshot; they do not prove the interpretation.
Advisory review map
Governance Relevance
EU AI Act
Official Journal text, 2024
Which recorded policy statements may be relevant to transparency, automated decisions, data use and human oversight review?
- AI training opt-out
- Opt-Out
- Algorithmic transparency
- Opaque
- AI bias and fairness
- Absent
ISO/IEC 42001
ISO/IEC 42001:2023 overview
Which recorded policy statements may inform an AI management-system review of transparency, risk oversight and independent assurance?
- Algorithmic transparency
- Opaque
- AI bias and fairness
- Absent
- Independent audit
- Absent
- Regulatory compliance
- Comprehensive
NIST AI RMF
AI RMF 1.0; NIST revision in progress, checked 2026-07-29
Which recorded policy statements may support Govern, Map, Measure or Manage review questions?
- Algorithmic transparency
- Opaque
- AI bias and fairness
- Absent
- Content moderation
- Opaque
OECD AI Principles
OECD AI Principles, updated 2024
Which recorded policy statements may be relevant to transparency, fairness, accountability and user agency review?
- Consent mechanism
- Opt-Out
- Algorithmic transparency
- Opaque
- AI bias and fairness
- Absent
- Independent audit
- Absent
Mappings identify review relevance between recorded PolicyWatcher KPI fields and framework topics. They are not legal interpretations, conformity assessments, certifications or compliance verdicts.
Exact change-bound files
Report Output
Both files are generated from this exact change ID.
Download exact-change PDF Download exact-change JSON9fe8b3540d895fb77248cecb9faf8a58c5c22e688fd8661e68166902f42a3640Questions before reuse
- Does the original Privacy Policy source still match the recorded public snapshot version 3?
- Do the cited source passages support each displayed reason, KPI value and regional note?
- Which advisory framework topics require specialist legal, risk or governance review for this use case?
- Has a later public change superseded this packet before it is reused in a decision or publication?