PolicyWatcherPublic evidence laboratory

Public Evidence Packet

Anthropic - Privacy Policy

Privacy Policy

742c9bd7-04e7-474b-8484-d2f4e670177c
Screening date
22 Oct 2026, 11:42 UTC
Jurisdiction
Global
Risk screening
Medium · 6/10
Score trace
Baseline; no earlier public change

This packet records PolicyWatcher evidence and AI-assisted screening for one public change. It is not legal advice, a compliance verdict, a certification, or proof that the external source remains unchanged.

  1. 01Source evidence
  2. 02Explainability
  3. 03Governance Relevance
  4. 04Report Output
01

Dataset QA · sanitized public view

Source evidence

Publication gate
Published
Retrieval state
Recorded retrieval available
Latest retrieval
22 Oct 2026, 11:42 UTC
Sanitized channel
direct
Data status
Available
Public snapshot evidence
Available

Public snapshot fingerprints

Previous · version 1d5e44bd43ea79a3753bdd99f4a2a105c825b8de55149646c9c3cc007ed11d2acCaptured 02 Oct 2026, 04:55 UTC
Current · version 2fa3c2c9786ca92b832bdbfd3e9ab8d50a8b7a3a9daf8c4333827483a479a24b3Captured 22 Oct 2026, 11:42 UTC

Source confidence describes recorded retrieval and publication state. It does not rate the provider policy or certify source authenticity.

02

Source-anchored screening trace

Explainability

The Anthropic Privacy Policy has no material changes; data collection, usage, and user rights remain consistent with the previous version.

  1. Reason 10 score contribution

    No material changes found in the policy content.

    Related KPI
    No related KPI recorded
    Source side
    Not recorded
    Source passage not recorded

    This historical reason has no recorded source passage.

  2. Reason 20 score contribution

    Data collection and processing practices remain consistent.

    Related KPI
    No related KPI recorded
    Source side
    Not recorded
    Source passage not recorded

    This historical reason has no recorded source passage.

  3. Reason 30 score contribution

    User rights and opt-out mechanisms are unchanged.

    Related KPI
    No related KPI recorded
    Source side
    Not recorded
    Source passage not recorded

    This historical reason has no recorded source passage.

Score reasons and deltaScore values are stored AI-assisted screening outputs. Verified anchors confirm only that the quoted passage occurs in the named snapshot; they do not prove the interpretation.

03

Advisory review map

Governance Relevance

EU AI Act

Official Journal text, 2024

Mapped evidence

Which recorded policy statements may be relevant to transparency, automated decisions, data use and human oversight review?

AI training opt-out
Opt-Out
Algorithmic transparency
Opaque
Automated decisions
Partial
AI bias and fairness
Absent
Framework source

ISO/IEC 42001

ISO/IEC 42001:2023 overview

Mapped evidence

Which recorded policy statements may inform an AI management-system review of transparency, risk oversight and independent assurance?

Algorithmic transparency
Opaque
AI bias and fairness
Absent
Independent audit
Absent
Regulatory compliance
Comprehensive
Framework source

NIST AI RMF

AI RMF 1.0; NIST revision in progress, checked 2026-07-29

Mapped evidence

Which recorded policy statements may support Govern, Map, Measure or Manage review questions?

Algorithmic transparency
Opaque
Automated decisions
Partial
AI bias and fairness
Absent
Content moderation
Opaque
Framework source

OECD AI Principles

OECD AI Principles, updated 2024

Mapped evidence

Which recorded policy statements may be relevant to transparency, fairness, accountability and user agency review?

Consent mechanism
Opt-Out
Algorithmic transparency
Opaque
AI bias and fairness
Absent
Independent audit
Absent
Framework source

Mappings identify review relevance between recorded PolicyWatcher KPI fields and framework topics. They are not legal interpretations, conformity assessments, certifications or compliance verdicts.

04

Exact change-bound files

Report Output

Both files are generated from this exact change ID.

Download exact-change PDF Download exact-change JSON
Packet content digest · SHA-256d494e323f20b738464658ee0ee5113d56c6b0149ee213c528bfa9afe47d5fde2

Questions before reuse

  1. Does the original Privacy Policy source still match the recorded public snapshot version 2?
  2. Do the cited source passages support each displayed reason, KPI value and regional note?
  3. Which advisory framework topics require specialist legal, risk or governance review for this use case?
  4. Has a later public change superseded this packet before it is reused in a decision or publication?