Public Evidence Packet
Google - AI Terms of Service
AI Terms of Service
7107f09e-0e1a-43cd-9af9-3a088d026d87- Screening date
- 24 Jul 2026, 20:56 UTC
- Jurisdiction
- Global
- Risk screening
- Medium · 6/10
- Score trace
- Baseline; no earlier public change
This packet records PolicyWatcher evidence and AI-assisted screening for one public change. It is not legal advice, a compliance verdict, a certification, or proof that the external source remains unchanged.
- 01Source evidence
- 02Explainability
- 03Governance Relevance
- 04Report Output
Dataset QA · sanitized public view
Source evidence
- Publication gate
- Published
- Retrieval state
- Recorded retrieval available
- Latest retrieval
- 04 Nov 2026, 18:42 UTC
- Sanitized channel
direct- Data status
- Available
- Public snapshot evidence
- Available
Public snapshot fingerprints
122e1026c69262978dde5119afbe4be1d12ce413aad1d609d72133e540d3c496Captured 06 Jul 2026, 07:19 UTC8a4d7a6acf814669d08fa67bccc1c2389e31acffa642f3b1d7117710773f7a50Captured 24 Jul 2026, 20:56 UTCSource confidence describes recorded retrieval and publication state. It does not rate the provider policy or certify source authenticity.
Source-anchored screening trace
Explainability
The Generative AI Additional Terms of Service remain unchanged, maintaining existing restrictions on AI model development and content disclaimers.
- Reason 1+2 score contribution
Prohibition on developing ML models restricts business use.
- Related KPI
- No related KPI recorded
- Source side
- Not recorded
Source passage not recordedThis historical reason has no recorded source passage.
- Reason 2+1 score contribution
Content disclaimers require user discretion and caution.
- Related KPI
- No related KPI recorded
- Source side
- Not recorded
Source passage not recordedThis historical reason has no recorded source passage.
- Reason 3+1 score contribution
Lack of explicit data usage details in these specific terms.
- Related KPI
- No related KPI recorded
- Source side
- Not recorded
Source passage not recordedThis historical reason has no recorded source passage.
Score reasons and deltaScore values are stored AI-assisted screening outputs. Verified anchors confirm only that the quoted passage occurs in the named snapshot; they do not prove the interpretation.
Advisory review map
Governance Relevance
EU AI Act
Official Journal text, 2024
Which recorded policy statements may be relevant to transparency, automated decisions, data use and human oversight review?
- AI training opt-out
- Not Available
- Algorithmic transparency
- Opaque
- Automated decisions
- Opaque
- AI bias and fairness
- Absent
ISO/IEC 42001
ISO/IEC 42001:2023 overview
Which recorded policy statements may inform an AI management-system review of transparency, risk oversight and independent assurance?
- Algorithmic transparency
- Opaque
- AI bias and fairness
- Absent
- Independent audit
- Absent
- Regulatory compliance
- Partial
NIST AI RMF
AI RMF 1.0; NIST revision in progress, checked 2026-07-29
Which recorded policy statements may support Govern, Map, Measure or Manage review questions?
- Algorithmic transparency
- Opaque
- Automated decisions
- Opaque
- AI bias and fairness
- Absent
- Content moderation
- Opaque
OECD AI Principles
OECD AI Principles, updated 2024
Which recorded policy statements may be relevant to transparency, fairness, accountability and user agency review?
- Consent mechanism
- Implicit
- Algorithmic transparency
- Opaque
- AI bias and fairness
- Absent
- Independent audit
- Absent
Mappings identify review relevance between recorded PolicyWatcher KPI fields and framework topics. They are not legal interpretations, conformity assessments, certifications or compliance verdicts.
Exact change-bound files
Report Output
Both files are generated from this exact change ID.
Download exact-change PDF Download exact-change JSON4b18eb79095b0bbe96e89e68e71801beea263f50d1738c986558a69f6c8f4d21Questions before reuse
- Does the original AI Terms of Service source still match the recorded public snapshot version 2?
- Do the cited source passages support each displayed reason, KPI value and regional note?
- Which advisory framework topics require specialist legal, risk or governance review for this use case?
- Has a later public change superseded this packet before it is reused in a decision or publication?