PolicyWatcherPublic evidence laboratory

Public Evidence Packet

PayPal - Privacy Statement

Privacy Statement

586c3d9a-1d5d-43dd-bb5e-ca0ef15995ea
Screening date
01 Aug 2026, 04:37 UTC
Jurisdiction
US
Risk screening
High · 7/10
Score trace
-1 points from previous public change

This packet records PolicyWatcher evidence and AI-assisted screening for one public change. It is not legal advice, a compliance verdict, a certification, or proof that the external source remains unchanged.

  1. 01Source evidence
  2. 02Explainability
  3. 03Governance Relevance
  4. 04Report Output
01

Dataset QA · sanitized public view

Source evidence

Publication gate
Published
Retrieval state
Recorded retrieval available
Latest retrieval
05 Nov 2026, 18:41 UTC
Sanitized channel
direct
Data status
Available
Public snapshot evidence
Available

Public snapshot fingerprints

Previous · version 3454b2ac83b0b91a71efa67e3f19979294f3439aec17b937619690174e02bf9bbCaptured 10 Jul 2026, 01:47 UTC
Current · version 406b8d9b74879230525e3aad0c15e820f38dba6d2c41a3a99c9baac8c95465ef6Captured 01 Aug 2026, 04:37 UTC

Source confidence describes recorded retrieval and publication state. It does not rate the provider policy or certify source authenticity.

02

Source-anchored screening trace

Explainability

The PayPal Privacy Statement remains unchanged, detailing extensive data collection, broad sharing, and AI use for training and automated decisions.

  1. Reason 10 score contribution

    Extensive collection of personal and sensitive data.

    Related KPI
    Data collection
    Source side
    new snapshot
    Verified exact source passage

    “Biometric data: Such as voice identification, photo identification, or face scans, which we may collect when you consent in the user experience”

  2. Reason 20 score contribution

    Broad sharing of data with numerous third parties.

    Related KPI
    Third-party sharing
    Source side
    Not recorded
    Source passage not recorded

    This historical reason has no recorded source passage.

  3. Reason 30 score contribution

    AI training and automated decisions lack transparency.

    Related KPI
    AI training opt-out
    Source side
    Not recorded
    Source passage not recorded

    This historical reason has no recorded source passage.

Score reasons and deltaScore values are stored AI-assisted screening outputs. Verified anchors confirm only that the quoted passage occurs in the named snapshot; they do not prove the interpretation.

03

Advisory review map

Governance Relevance

EU AI Act

Official Journal text, 2024

Mapped evidence

Which recorded policy statements may be relevant to transparency, automated decisions, data use and human oversight review?

AI training opt-out
Not Available
Algorithmic transparency
Opaque
Automated decisions
Partial
AI bias and fairness
Absent
Framework source

ISO/IEC 42001

ISO/IEC 42001:2023 overview

Mapped evidence

Which recorded policy statements may inform an AI management-system review of transparency, risk oversight and independent assurance?

Algorithmic transparency
Opaque
AI bias and fairness
Absent
Independent audit
Absent
Regulatory compliance
Comprehensive
Framework source

NIST AI RMF

AI RMF 1.0; NIST revision in progress, checked 2026-07-29

Mapped evidence

Which recorded policy statements may support Govern, Map, Measure or Manage review questions?

Algorithmic transparency
Opaque
Automated decisions
Partial
AI bias and fairness
Absent
Framework source

OECD AI Principles

OECD AI Principles, updated 2024

Mapped evidence

Which recorded policy statements may be relevant to transparency, fairness, accountability and user agency review?

Consent mechanism
Explicit Opt-In
Algorithmic transparency
Opaque
AI bias and fairness
Absent
Independent audit
Absent
Framework source

Mappings identify review relevance between recorded PolicyWatcher KPI fields and framework topics. They are not legal interpretations, conformity assessments, certifications or compliance verdicts.

04

Exact change-bound files

Report Output

Both files are generated from this exact change ID.

Download exact-change PDF Download exact-change JSON
Packet content digest · SHA-256400115328df5056ca896d689fc50aedd7bebd17756ee7022ebf214b7b3bc7dbb

Questions before reuse

  1. Does the original Privacy Statement source still match the recorded public snapshot version 4?
  2. Do the cited source passages support each displayed reason, KPI value and regional note?
  3. Which advisory framework topics require specialist legal, risk or governance review for this use case?
  4. Has a later public change superseded this packet before it is reused in a decision or publication?