Public Evidence Packet
Wise - Privacy Policy
Privacy Policy
52528494-9dc1-47d6-85b0-cd445dc3572a- Screening date
- 23 Oct 2026, 11:44 UTC
- Jurisdiction
- EU
- Risk screening
- High · 7/10
- Score trace
- +1 points from previous public change
This packet records PolicyWatcher evidence and AI-assisted screening for one public change. It is not legal advice, a compliance verdict, a certification, or proof that the external source remains unchanged.
- 01Source evidence
- 02Explainability
- 03Governance Relevance
- 04Report Output
Dataset QA · sanitized public view
Source evidence
- Publication gate
- Published
- Retrieval state
- Recorded retrieval available
- Latest retrieval
- 23 Oct 2026, 11:44 UTC
- Sanitized channel
direct- Data status
- Available
- Public snapshot evidence
- Available
Public snapshot fingerprints
24c8d27f01acbce767c162ffbe4ae8a7b84223110b9383a7dc9c2b7723d84475Captured 19 Jul 2026, 03:55 UTCc98c9db2c903d6a34b8e2770153a37be8a6ab820a31508dc870af76a3d2cdae5Captured 23 Oct 2026, 11:44 UTCSource confidence describes recorded retrieval and publication state. It does not rate the provider policy or certify source authenticity.
Source-anchored screening trace
Explainability
The Wise Privacy Policy remains unchanged, with no new privacy implications for users or businesses.
- Reason 10 score contribution
Extensive collection of sensitive biometric data for KYC and fraud.
- Related KPI
- Data collection
- Source side
- old snapshot
Verified exact source passage
“In some jurisdictions we will also collect facial scan data extracted from your photo or video (known as ‘biometric data’).”
- Reason 20 score contribution
Automated decisions can impact users, though human review is available.
- Related KPI
- Automated decisions
- Source side
- old snapshot
Verified exact source passage
“These processes may make an automated decision to reject your application or a proposed transaction, to block a suspicious attempt to log into your Wise account, or to close your account.”
- Reason 30 score contribution
Broad sharing of personal data with numerous third parties.
- Related KPI
- Third-party sharing
- Source side
- Not recorded
Source passage not recordedThis historical reason has no recorded source passage.
Score reasons and deltaScore values are stored AI-assisted screening outputs. Verified anchors confirm only that the quoted passage occurs in the named snapshot; they do not prove the interpretation.
Advisory review map
Governance Relevance
EU AI Act
Official Journal text, 2024
Which recorded policy statements may be relevant to transparency, automated decisions, data use and human oversight review?
- AI training opt-out
- Not Available
- Algorithmic transparency
- Mentioned
- Automated decisions
- Partial
- AI bias and fairness
- Absent
ISO/IEC 42001
ISO/IEC 42001:2023 overview
Which recorded policy statements may inform an AI management-system review of transparency, risk oversight and independent assurance?
- Algorithmic transparency
- Mentioned
- AI bias and fairness
- Absent
- Independent audit
- Certified
- Regulatory compliance
- Comprehensive
NIST AI RMF
AI RMF 1.0; NIST revision in progress, checked 2026-07-29
Which recorded policy statements may support Govern, Map, Measure or Manage review questions?
- Algorithmic transparency
- Mentioned
- Automated decisions
- Partial
- AI bias and fairness
- Absent
OECD AI Principles
OECD AI Principles, updated 2024
Which recorded policy statements may be relevant to transparency, fairness, accountability and user agency review?
- Consent mechanism
- Opt-Out
- Algorithmic transparency
- Mentioned
- AI bias and fairness
- Absent
- Independent audit
- Certified
Mappings identify review relevance between recorded PolicyWatcher KPI fields and framework topics. They are not legal interpretations, conformity assessments, certifications or compliance verdicts.
Exact change-bound files
Report Output
Both files are generated from this exact change ID.
Download exact-change PDF Download exact-change JSON85efd90fd608a397b4b6d675a7c3fdfe3aaca1e2c86a0cc5e6319f7a147f9fe0Questions before reuse
- Does the original Privacy Policy source still match the recorded public snapshot version 3?
- Do the cited source passages support each displayed reason, KPI value and regional note?
- Which advisory framework topics require specialist legal, risk or governance review for this use case?
- Has a later public change superseded this packet before it is reused in a decision or publication?