Public Evidence Packet
OpenAI
Terms of Use
4e8ed932-090d-4a02-8304-22144bfdbff5- Screening date
- 28 Jul 2026, 22:39 UTC
- Jurisdiction
- Global
- Risk screening
- Medium · 6/10
- Score trace
- Baseline; no earlier public change
This packet records PolicyWatcher evidence and AI-assisted screening for one public change. It is not legal advice, a compliance verdict, a certification, or proof that the external source remains unchanged.
- 01Source Confidence
- 02Explainability
- 03Governance Relevance
- 04Report Output
Dataset QA · sanitized public view
Source Confidence
- Publication gate
- Published
- Retrieval state
- Review required
- Latest retrieval
- 06 Jul 2026, 03:59 UTC
- Sanitized channel
seeded- Data status
- Available
- Public snapshot evidence
- Available
Public snapshot fingerprints
599267d5fa112f01fc9d48479ad4139cd2c5f1e10e1da00ddf2b5f57be256aabCaptured 06 Jul 2026, 07:19 UTCe1b6c7256017665913760b6f42591f7b2c3ac632c46ff6f001a7bb0d462e61b8Captured 28 Jul 2026, 22:39 UTCSource confidence describes recorded retrieval and publication state. It does not rate the provider policy or certify source authenticity.
Source-anchored screening trace
Explainability
You own your AI output and can opt-out of training, but corporate email use risks employer access and you must verify AI accuracy.
- Reason 1+2 score contribution
Corporate email use allows employer control over personal accounts.
- Related KPI
- No related KPI recorded
- Source side
- Not recorded
Source passage not recordedThis historical reason has no recorded source passage.
- Reason 2+1 score contribution
Broad 'worldwide' content use implies extensive data transfers.
- Related KPI
- No related KPI recorded
- Source side
- Not recorded
Source passage not recordedThis historical reason has no recorded source passage.
- Reason 3+1 score contribution
Users must verify AI output accuracy; OpenAI disclaims responsibility.
- Related KPI
- No related KPI recorded
- Source side
- Not recorded
Source passage not recordedThis historical reason has no recorded source passage.
Score reasons and deltaScore values are stored AI-assisted screening outputs. Verified anchors confirm only that the quoted passage occurs in the named snapshot; they do not prove the interpretation.
Advisory review map
Governance Relevance
EU AI Act
Official Journal text, 2024
Which recorded policy statements may be relevant to transparency, automated decisions, data use and human oversight review?
- AI training opt-out
- Opt-Out
- Algorithmic transparency
- Opaque
- Automated decisions
- Opaque
- AI bias and fairness
- Absent
ISO/IEC 42001
ISO/IEC 42001:2023 overview
Which recorded policy statements may inform an AI management-system review of transparency, risk oversight and independent assurance?
- Algorithmic transparency
- Opaque
- AI bias and fairness
- Absent
- Independent audit
- Absent
- Regulatory compliance
- Comprehensive
NIST AI RMF
AI RMF 1.0; NIST revision in progress, checked 2026-07-29
Which recorded policy statements may support Govern, Map, Measure or Manage review questions?
Exact change-bound files
Report Output
Both files are generated from this exact change ID.
Download exact-change PDF Download exact-change JSONfc987bab5d8ac9d566374d377f4a6c45dbd45055846ecb30cb16d772a7c0cfcdQuestions before reuse
- Does the original Terms of Use source still match the recorded public snapshot version 2?
- Do the cited source passages support each displayed reason, KPI value and regional note?
- Which advisory framework topics require specialist legal, risk or governance review for this use case?
- Has a later public change superseded this packet before it is reused in a decision or publication?