Public Evidence Packet
Anthropic - Privacy Policy
Privacy Policy
4ae50dcf-48c0-40f8-b4d0-b36be7a2d254- Screening date
- 07 Nov 2026, 19:41 UTC
- Jurisdiction
- Global
- Risk screening
- Medium · 6/10
- Score trace
- 0 points; unchanged
This packet records PolicyWatcher evidence and AI-assisted screening for one public change. It is not legal advice, a compliance verdict, a certification, or proof that the external source remains unchanged.
- 01Source evidence
- 02Explainability
- 03Governance Relevance
- 04Report Output
Dataset QA · sanitized public view
Source evidence
- Publication gate
- Published
- Retrieval state
- Recorded retrieval available
- Latest retrieval
- 07 Nov 2026, 19:41 UTC
- Sanitized channel
direct- Data status
- Available
- Public snapshot evidence
- Available
Public snapshot fingerprints
fa3c2c9786ca92b832bdbfd3e9ab8d50a8b7a3a9daf8c4333827483a479a24b3Captured 22 Oct 2026, 11:42 UTCcf2e9643927a84a5292d48955908b5653ea60f065036c58874dc8b2cd7c09060Captured 07 Nov 2026, 19:41 UTCSource confidence describes recorded retrieval and publication state. It does not rate the provider policy or certify source authenticity.
Source-anchored screening trace
Explainability
This policy version shows no changes, maintaining existing data collection, AI training practices with opt-out, and cross-border data transfer mechanisms.
- Reason 10 score contribution
Extensive data collection for AI training, including user inputs.
- Related KPI
- Data collection
- Source side
- old snapshot
Verified exact source passage
“Data that our users or crowd workers provide, including Inputs and Outputs from our Services (unless users opt out)”
- Reason 20 score contribution
Cross-border data transfers to countries outside EEA/UK.
- Related KPI
- Cross-border transfer
- Source side
- old snapshot
Verified exact source passage
“your personal data is transferred to our servers in the US, or to other countries outside the European Economic Area (“EEA”) and the UK”
- Reason 30 score contribution
Biometric data collected for identity verification purposes.
- Related KPI
- Data collection
- Source side
- old snapshot
Verified exact source passage
“facial geometry templates (which may be considered ‘biometric data’ in some jurisdictions)”
Score reasons and deltaScore values are stored AI-assisted screening outputs. Verified anchors confirm only that the quoted passage occurs in the named snapshot; they do not prove the interpretation.
Advisory review map
Governance Relevance
EU AI Act
Official Journal text, 2024
Which recorded policy statements may be relevant to transparency, automated decisions, data use and human oversight review?
- AI training opt-out
- Opt-Out
- Algorithmic transparency
- Opaque
- Automated decisions
- Opaque
- AI bias and fairness
- Absent
ISO/IEC 42001
ISO/IEC 42001:2023 overview
Which recorded policy statements may inform an AI management-system review of transparency, risk oversight and independent assurance?
- Algorithmic transparency
- Opaque
- AI bias and fairness
- Absent
- Independent audit
- Absent
- Regulatory compliance
- Comprehensive
NIST AI RMF
AI RMF 1.0; NIST revision in progress, checked 2026-07-29
Which recorded policy statements may support Govern, Map, Measure or Manage review questions?
- Algorithmic transparency
- Opaque
- Automated decisions
- Opaque
- AI bias and fairness
- Absent
- Content moderation
- Opaque
OECD AI Principles
OECD AI Principles, updated 2024
Which recorded policy statements may be relevant to transparency, fairness, accountability and user agency review?
- Consent mechanism
- Opt-Out
- Algorithmic transparency
- Opaque
- AI bias and fairness
- Absent
- Independent audit
- Absent
Mappings identify review relevance between recorded PolicyWatcher KPI fields and framework topics. They are not legal interpretations, conformity assessments, certifications or compliance verdicts.
Exact change-bound files
Report Output
Both files are generated from this exact change ID.
Download exact-change PDF Download exact-change JSONf3dd991a017e42f04861aa713ebe50d0e0f29ce6e193f0c341994ce959350d55Questions before reuse
- Does the original Privacy Policy source still match the recorded public snapshot version 3?
- Do the cited source passages support each displayed reason, KPI value and regional note?
- Which advisory framework topics require specialist legal, risk or governance review for this use case?
- Has a later public change superseded this packet before it is reused in a decision or publication?