Public Evidence Packet
Microsoft
Privacy Statement
494ffd08-1c2e-43ae-b332-5d4b316fbaa2- Screening date
- 01 Aug 2026, 04:33 UTC
- Jurisdiction
- EU
- Risk screening
- Medium · 7/10
- Score trace
- Baseline; no earlier public change
This packet records PolicyWatcher evidence and AI-assisted screening for one public change. It is not legal advice, a compliance verdict, a certification, or proof that the external source remains unchanged.
- 01Source Confidence
- 02Explainability
- 03Governance Relevance
- 04Report Output
Dataset QA · sanitized public view
Source Confidence
- Publication gate
- Published
- Retrieval state
- Review required
- Latest retrieval
- 06 Jul 2026, 09:39 UTC
- Sanitized channel
other- Data status
- Available
- Public snapshot evidence
- Available
Public snapshot fingerprints
31390510da4eb9e948bbd71d045e274379ab853432487860ffba5669fbd188b5Captured 06 Jul 2026, 09:42 UTCebb4c380a7ff6968ecdf966c968efd3dbf3248f73f4bb5f5a14735d7a84f5730Captured 01 Aug 2026, 04:33 UTCSource confidence describes recorded retrieval and publication state. It does not rate the provider policy or certify source authenticity.
Source-anchored screening trace
Explainability
The updated policy now explicitly allows sharing your age group information with third-party apps, increasing data sharing and potential privacy risks.
- Reason 1+1 score contribution
Reduced user control over age data sharing with third parties.
- Related KPI
- Consent mechanism
- Source side
- new snapshot
Verified exact source passage
“We may share age group information with Microsoft apps and services, as well as third-party apps”
- Reason 2+1 score contribution
Potential for broader data exposure due to expanded sharing of age data.
- Related KPI
- Data collection
- Source side
- new snapshot
Verified exact source passage
“We may share age group information with Microsoft apps and services, as well as third-party apps”
Score reasons and deltaScore values are stored AI-assisted screening outputs. Verified anchors confirm only that the quoted passage occurs in the named snapshot; they do not prove the interpretation.
Advisory review map
Governance Relevance
EU AI Act
Official Journal text, 2024
Which recorded policy statements may be relevant to transparency, automated decisions, data use and human oversight review?
- AI training opt-out
- Not Available
- Algorithmic transparency
- Opaque
- Automated decisions
- Partial
- AI bias and fairness
- Absent
ISO/IEC 42001
ISO/IEC 42001:2023 overview
Which recorded policy statements may inform an AI management-system review of transparency, risk oversight and independent assurance?
- Algorithmic transparency
- Opaque
- AI bias and fairness
- Absent
- Independent audit
- Absent
- Regulatory compliance
- Partial
NIST AI RMF
AI RMF 1.0; NIST revision in progress, checked 2026-07-29
Which recorded policy statements may support Govern, Map, Measure or Manage review questions?
Exact change-bound files
Report Output
Both files are generated from this exact change ID.
Download exact-change PDF Download exact-change JSON3ac7ee16901c7056980378648920f7cab43dfb5e3d9157f589712cb02a7d7786Questions before reuse
- Does the original Privacy Statement source still match the recorded public snapshot version 2?
- Do the cited source passages support each displayed reason, KPI value and regional note?
- Which advisory framework topics require specialist legal, risk or governance review for this use case?
- Has a later public change superseded this packet before it is reused in a decision or publication?