Public Evidence Packet
Revolut - Privacy Policy
Privacy Policy
3f664da1-706b-446a-8c0a-1902a7a06274- Screening date
- 23 Sept 2026, 17:18 UTC
- Jurisdiction
- UK
- Risk screening
- High · 7/10
- Score trace
- Baseline; no earlier public change
This packet records PolicyWatcher evidence and AI-assisted screening for one public change. It is not legal advice, a compliance verdict, a certification, or proof that the external source remains unchanged.
- 01Source evidence
- 02Explainability
- 03Governance Relevance
- 04Report Output
Dataset QA · sanitized public view
Source evidence
- Publication gate
- Published
- Retrieval state
- Recorded retrieval available
- Latest retrieval
- 23 Sept 2026, 17:18 UTC
- Sanitized channel
archive- Data status
- Available
- Public snapshot evidence
- Available
Public snapshot fingerprints
081254b3d739552eabb507355ad50f31976ac526df92272bdb7f66881372a139Captured 06 Jul 2026, 07:15 UTCe5f127c4f1e67ee6737e81d6ca5ff8bccb917a5dfa0355970ce894c99d4febd3Captured 23 Sept 2026, 17:18 UTCSource confidence describes recorded retrieval and publication state. It does not rate the provider policy or certify source authenticity.
Source-anchored screening trace
Explainability
No changes were detected between the old and new versions of Revolut's Privacy Policy, which will become effective on March 17, 2026.
- Reason 10 score contribution
Extensive data collection, including biometric, behavioral, and device metadata.
- Related KPI
- Data collection
- Source side
- Not recorded
Source passage not recordedThis historical reason has no recorded source passage.
- Reason 20 score contribution
Broad third-party sharing with credit agencies, fraud prevention, and crypto partners.
- Related KPI
- Third-party sharing
- Source side
- Not recorded
Source passage not recordedThis historical reason has no recorded source passage.
- Reason 30 score contribution
Automated decision-making for eligibility and risk assessment is explicitly stated.
- Related KPI
- Automated decisions
- Source side
- Not recorded
Source passage not recordedThis historical reason has no recorded source passage.
Score reasons and deltaScore values are stored AI-assisted screening outputs. Verified anchors confirm only that the quoted passage occurs in the named snapshot; they do not prove the interpretation.
Advisory review map
Governance Relevance
EU AI Act
Official Journal text, 2024
Which recorded policy statements may be relevant to transparency, automated decisions, data use and human oversight review?
- AI training opt-out
- Not Available
- Algorithmic transparency
- Mentioned
- Automated decisions
- Partial
- AI bias and fairness
- Absent
ISO/IEC 42001
ISO/IEC 42001:2023 overview
Which recorded policy statements may inform an AI management-system review of transparency, risk oversight and independent assurance?
- Algorithmic transparency
- Mentioned
- AI bias and fairness
- Absent
- Independent audit
- Absent
- Regulatory compliance
- Comprehensive
NIST AI RMF
AI RMF 1.0; NIST revision in progress, checked 2026-07-29
Which recorded policy statements may support Govern, Map, Measure or Manage review questions?
- Algorithmic transparency
- Mentioned
- Automated decisions
- Partial
- AI bias and fairness
- Absent
OECD AI Principles
OECD AI Principles, updated 2024
Which recorded policy statements may be relevant to transparency, fairness, accountability and user agency review?
- Consent mechanism
- Opt-Out
- Algorithmic transparency
- Mentioned
- AI bias and fairness
- Absent
- Independent audit
- Absent
Mappings identify review relevance between recorded PolicyWatcher KPI fields and framework topics. They are not legal interpretations, conformity assessments, certifications or compliance verdicts.
Exact change-bound files
Report Output
Both files are generated from this exact change ID.
Download exact-change PDF Download exact-change JSON989d0225fe4493725d77ede4d2f7c88f6d339411bb2c8b99ef782f96624a6fd9Questions before reuse
- Does the original Privacy Policy source still match the recorded public snapshot version 2?
- Do the cited source passages support each displayed reason, KPI value and regional note?
- Which advisory framework topics require specialist legal, risk or governance review for this use case?
- Has a later public change superseded this packet before it is reused in a decision or publication?