Public Evidence Packet
Google - Privacy Policy
Privacy Policy
25330a35-6bce-4de2-8716-1796e250e928- Screening date
- 14 Oct 2026, 03:41 UTC
- Jurisdiction
- Global
- Risk screening
- Medium · 5/10
- Score trace
- -1 points from previous public change
This packet records PolicyWatcher evidence and AI-assisted screening for one public change. It is not legal advice, a compliance verdict, a certification, or proof that the external source remains unchanged.
- 01Source evidence
- 02Explainability
- 03Governance Relevance
- 04Report Output
Dataset QA · sanitized public view
Source evidence
- Publication gate
- Published
- Retrieval state
- Recorded retrieval available
- Latest retrieval
- 22 Oct 2026, 11:38 UTC
- Sanitized channel
direct- Data status
- Available
- Public snapshot evidence
- Available
Public snapshot fingerprints
3e68770c74db79945a9864618429780a62729ad217d96163fe55166b24fdc337Captured 01 Oct 2026, 19:45 UTCdb08325ace1e8979a4ff707d93b4f53a581848d15b0ddb5ce57d5f26c4150293Captured 14 Oct 2026, 03:41 UTCSource confidence describes recorded retrieval and publication state. It does not rate the provider policy or certify source authenticity.
Source-anchored screening trace
Explainability
Google clarified how it collects and uses unsigned-out data via unique identifiers across devices.
- Reason 1+2 score contribution
New explicit clause covering data collection without an active account.
- Related KPI
- Data collection
- Source side
- new snapshot
Verified exact source passage
“Google also collects and uses data that is not associated with your account.”
- Reason 2+1 score contribution
Expanded tracking scope across devices for signed-out users.
- Related KPI
- Third-party sharing
- Source side
- new snapshot
Verified exact source passage
“or ads based on your activity across devices.”
- Reason 30 score contribution
Unchanged data retention and account deletion mechanisms.
- Related KPI
- Data retention
- Source side
- Not recorded
Source passage not recordedThis historical reason has no recorded source passage.
Score reasons and deltaScore values are stored AI-assisted screening outputs. Verified anchors confirm only that the quoted passage occurs in the named snapshot; they do not prove the interpretation.
Advisory review map
Governance Relevance
EU AI Act
Official Journal text, 2024
Which recorded policy statements may be relevant to transparency, automated decisions, data use and human oversight review?
- Algorithmic transparency
- Opaque
- Automated decisions
- Transparent
- AI bias and fairness
- Mentioned
ISO/IEC 42001
ISO/IEC 42001:2023 overview
Which recorded policy statements may inform an AI management-system review of transparency, risk oversight and independent assurance?
- Algorithmic transparency
- Opaque
- AI bias and fairness
- Mentioned
- Independent audit
- Mentioned
- Regulatory compliance
- Comprehensive
NIST AI RMF
AI RMF 1.0; NIST revision in progress, checked 2026-07-29
Which recorded policy statements may support Govern, Map, Measure or Manage review questions?
- Algorithmic transparency
- Opaque
- Automated decisions
- Transparent
- AI bias and fairness
- Mentioned
- Content moderation
- Transparent
OECD AI Principles
OECD AI Principles, updated 2024
Which recorded policy statements may be relevant to transparency, fairness, accountability and user agency review?
- Consent mechanism
- Opt-Out
- Algorithmic transparency
- Opaque
- AI bias and fairness
- Mentioned
- Independent audit
- Mentioned
Mappings identify review relevance between recorded PolicyWatcher KPI fields and framework topics. They are not legal interpretations, conformity assessments, certifications or compliance verdicts.
Exact change-bound files
Report Output
Both files are generated from this exact change ID.
Download exact-change PDF Download exact-change JSON19074aa50e5db9593f7ef0c97f47a19f86559c83bbcaf7fba1df2472107da3fbQuestions before reuse
- Does the original Privacy Policy source still match the recorded public snapshot version 4?
- Do the cited source passages support each displayed reason, KPI value and regional note?
- Which advisory framework topics require specialist legal, risk or governance review for this use case?
- Has a later public change superseded this packet before it is reused in a decision or publication?