Public Evidence Packet
Plaid - Plaid Account Terms
Plaid Account Terms
1493b82f-7a69-43a5-b1c8-612560d39a1d- Screening date
- 13 Nov 2026, 23:39 UTC
- Jurisdiction
- US
- Risk screening
- Medium · 6/10
- Score trace
- Baseline; no earlier public change
This packet records PolicyWatcher evidence and AI-assisted screening for one public change. It is not legal advice, a compliance verdict, a certification, or proof that the external source remains unchanged.
- 01Source evidence
- 02Explainability
- 03Governance Relevance
- 04Report Output
Dataset QA · sanitized public view
Source evidence
- Publication gate
- Published
- Retrieval state
- Recorded retrieval available
- Latest retrieval
- 13 Nov 2026, 23:39 UTC
- Sanitized channel
direct- Data status
- Available
- Public snapshot evidence
- Available
Public snapshot fingerprints
d3dca7615ff285c73ed819816e03a456ec68c39771b128027b86dcf178d758b7Captured 02 Oct 2026, 04:57 UTC91e9bc7b8860db14ed460ed1837ff75c312690fa2e6a7ed0a2bf7647af88eb4fCaptured 13 Nov 2026, 23:39 UTCSource confidence describes recorded retrieval and publication state. It does not rate the provider policy or certify source authenticity.
Source-anchored screening trace
Explainability
Plaid's Account Terms now offer a Spanish version, improving accessibility, but core data practices remain unchanged.
- Reason 1+1 score contribution
Improved language accessibility for Spanish speakers.
- Related KPI
- Regulatory compliance
- Source side
- new snapshot
Verified exact source passage
“- Español - Términos de la Cuenta de Plaid”
- Reason 20 score contribution
No changes to extensive data collection and sharing practices.
- Related KPI
- Data collection
- Source side
- Not recorded
Source passage not recordedThis historical reason has no recorded source passage.
- Reason 30 score contribution
Biometric data collection clause remains, raising privacy concerns.
- Related KPI
- Data collection
- Source side
- new snapshot
Verified exact source passage
“data we receive from this verification process, including data that is potentially considered biometric data in your jurisdiction, may be stored in your Plaid Account”
Score reasons and deltaScore values are stored AI-assisted screening outputs. Verified anchors confirm only that the quoted passage occurs in the named snapshot; they do not prove the interpretation.
Advisory review map
Governance Relevance
EU AI Act
Official Journal text, 2024
Which recorded policy statements may be relevant to transparency, automated decisions, data use and human oversight review?
- AI training opt-out
- Not Available
- Algorithmic transparency
- Opaque
- Automated decisions
- Opaque
- AI bias and fairness
- Absent
ISO/IEC 42001
ISO/IEC 42001:2023 overview
Which recorded policy statements may inform an AI management-system review of transparency, risk oversight and independent assurance?
- Algorithmic transparency
- Opaque
- AI bias and fairness
- Absent
- Independent audit
- Absent
- Regulatory compliance
- Partial
NIST AI RMF
AI RMF 1.0; NIST revision in progress, checked 2026-07-29
Which recorded policy statements may support Govern, Map, Measure or Manage review questions?
- Algorithmic transparency
- Opaque
- Automated decisions
- Opaque
- AI bias and fairness
- Absent
- Content moderation
- Opaque
OECD AI Principles
OECD AI Principles, updated 2024
Which recorded policy statements may be relevant to transparency, fairness, accountability and user agency review?
- Consent mechanism
- Implicit
- Algorithmic transparency
- Opaque
- AI bias and fairness
- Absent
- Independent audit
- Absent
Mappings identify review relevance between recorded PolicyWatcher KPI fields and framework topics. They are not legal interpretations, conformity assessments, certifications or compliance verdicts.
Exact change-bound files
Report Output
Both files are generated from this exact change ID.
Download exact-change PDF Download exact-change JSONbef6156b01b2bd85d22c0ee0738d86a78c07fd2b11546b040be2ba4a8d8dff60Questions before reuse
- Does the original Plaid Account Terms source still match the recorded public snapshot version 2?
- Do the cited source passages support each displayed reason, KPI value and regional note?
- Which advisory framework topics require specialist legal, risk or governance review for this use case?
- Has a later public change superseded this packet before it is reused in a decision or publication?